Ronald W. Pies
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment 18
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 17
- Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies 8
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health 20
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 9
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Mental Health and Psychiatry 31
-
- Mental Health Treatment and Access 8
-
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 7
Ronald W. Pies
118 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
- Psychiatry and Mental health 728
- Clinical Psychology 797
- Biological Psychiatry 73
- Applied Psychology 63
- Philosophy 130
Countries citing papers authored by Ronald W. Pies
This map shows the geographic impact of Ronald W. Pies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ronald W. Pies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ronald W. Pies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ronald W. Pies
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ronald W. Pies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ronald W. Pies. The network helps show where Ronald W. Pies may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ronald W. Pies, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 2 | Care of the Soul in the Time of COVID-19 | 2020 | 1 |
| 3 | The Upside and Downside of Religion, Spirituality, and Health. (Cover story) | 2020 | 1 |
| 4 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 5 | Does Psychiatry Medicalize Normality | 2013 | 0 |
| 6 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 7 | Toward A Concept of Instrumental Validity: Implications for Psychiatric Diagnosis | 2011 | 1 |
| 8 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 9 | FDA Lacks Desire for Flibanserin—But Does Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder Even Exist? | 2010 | 2 |
| 10 | 2010 | 49 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 15 | |
| 14 | Is It Bipolar Depression? 'WHIPLASHED' Aids Diagnosis | 2007 | 1 |
| 15 | 2006 | 161 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 22 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 148 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 20 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 22 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 14 |
About Ronald W. Pies
Ronald W. Pies is a scholar working on Philosophy, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 135 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (31 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (20 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (18 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (17 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (8 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (8 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (728 citations), Clinical Psychology (797 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (73 citations). Ronald W. Pies has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Lebanon and France. Frequent co-authors include Dean F. MacKinnon, Linda H. Chaudron, Sidney Zisook, S. Nassir Ghaemi, Christopher J. Miller, Klara J. Rosenquist, Douglas A. Berv, Barry D. Lebowitz, M. Katherine Shear and Naomi M. Simon.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.