Ronald B. Natale
- Oncology top 0.1%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 0.1%
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Surgery top 0.5%
- Cancer Research top 1%
- Co-authors
- Joan H. SchillerRoy S. HerbstMichael WolfSteven D. AverbuchE. David CrawfordMichael F. SarosdyV. O. SpeightsDavid P. Wood
- Topics
- Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (78 papers)Lung Cancer Research Studies (42 papers)Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (29 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Ronald B. Natale
164 papers receiving 13.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Oncology 8.4k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 7.6k
- Molecular Biology 3.9k
- Surgery 3.1k
- Cancer Research 1.5k
Countries citing papers authored by Ronald B. Natale
This map shows the geographic impact of Ronald B. Natale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ronald B. Natale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ronald B. Natale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ronald B. Natale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ronald B. Natale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ronald B. Natale. The network helps show where Ronald B. Natale may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ronald B. Natale
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ronald B. Natale. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ronald B. Natale based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ronald B. Natale. Ronald B. Natale is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 38 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 69 | |
| 8 | 194 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | 106 | |
| 13 | Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy plus Cystectomy Compared with Cystectomy Alone for Locally Advanced Bladder Cancerbreakdown → | 1834 |
| 14 | 51 | |
| 15 | 38 | |
| 16 | 58 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 38 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Ronald B. Natale
Ronald B. Natale is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Microbiology, having authored 170 papers that have together received 13.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (78 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (42 papers) and Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (29 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (8.4k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (7.6k citations) and Urology (992 citations). Ronald B. Natale has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Joan H. Schiller, Roy S. Herbst, Michael Wolf, Steven D. Averbuch, E. David Crawford, Michael F. Sarosdy, V. O. Speights, David P. Wood, Donald L. Trump and Nicholas J. Vogelzang. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and JAMA.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.