Romesh Diwan
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Management Information Systems top 10%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stephan KudybaMark A. LutzDennis LivingstonChandana ChakrabortySatya P. DasAustin RobinsonWilliam DieboldKanta Marwah
- Topics
- Economic Growth and Productivity (10 papers)Indian History and Philosophy (5 papers)Economic Theory and Policy (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Romesh Diwan
31 papers receiving 233 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Economics and Econometrics 133
- Strategy and Management 70
- Sociology and Political Science 59
- Management Information Systems 43
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 36
Countries citing papers authored by Romesh Diwan
This map shows the geographic impact of Romesh Diwan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Romesh Diwan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Romesh Diwan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Romesh Diwan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Romesh Diwan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Romesh Diwan. The network helps show where Romesh Diwan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Romesh Diwan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Romesh Diwan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Romesh Diwan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Romesh Diwan. Romesh Diwan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | THE NEW TECHNO-ECONOMIC PARADIGM: LABOR-USER OR LABOR-SAVER? | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | R&D and Components of Technical Change | 1 |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | Productivity and technical change in foodgrains | 2 |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | Structural Shifts Subsidies and Non-Market Factors in International Trade | 1 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | About the Growth Path of Firms | 10 |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Romesh Diwan
Romesh Diwan is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Philosophy, having authored 35 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Growth and Productivity (10 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (5 papers) and Economic Theory and Policy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (43 citations), Economics and Econometrics (133 citations) and Strategy and Management (70 citations). Romesh Diwan has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephan Kudyba, Mark A. Lutz, Dennis Livingston, Chandana Chakraborty, Satya P. Das, Austin Robinson, William Diebold, Kanta Marwah and Suresh M. Desai. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, World Development and Foreign Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.