Roland Scheer

6.0k total citations
173 papers, 5.0k citations indexed

About

Roland Scheer is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Roland Scheer has authored 173 papers receiving a total of 5.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 163 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 149 papers in Materials Chemistry and 54 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Roland Scheer's work include Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (155 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (132 papers) and Copper-based nanomaterials and applications (75 papers). Roland Scheer is often cited by papers focused on Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (155 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (132 papers) and Copper-based nanomaterials and applications (75 papers). Roland Scheer collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Spain and Japan. Roland Scheer's co-authors include Hans‐Werner Schock, H. J. Lewerenz, Matthias Maiberg, R. Klenk, A. Pérez‐Rodríguez, I. Luck, J. Álvarez-Garcı́a, A. Romano‐Rodrı́guez, J.R. Morante and J. Klaer and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Applied Physics.

In The Last Decade

Roland Scheer

171 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Roland Scheer Germany 38 4.6k 4.3k 884 210 204 173 5.0k
Daniel Abou‐Ras Germany 39 4.5k 1.0× 4.4k 1.0× 922 1.0× 236 1.1× 202 1.0× 178 5.3k
Dimitrios Hariskos Germany 37 8.2k 1.8× 7.7k 1.8× 1.7k 1.9× 182 0.9× 106 0.5× 128 8.4k
K. Durose United Kingdom 42 4.7k 1.0× 4.3k 1.0× 1.1k 1.3× 225 1.1× 289 1.4× 191 5.4k
David L. Young United States 36 5.3k 1.1× 4.0k 0.9× 1.3k 1.5× 295 1.4× 285 1.4× 178 6.0k
Fedwa El‐Mellouhi Qatar 30 2.5k 0.5× 2.3k 0.5× 437 0.5× 172 0.8× 328 1.6× 90 3.4k
David J. Binks United Kingdom 28 2.2k 0.5× 2.3k 0.5× 537 0.6× 239 1.1× 124 0.6× 127 3.0k
Kosuke Nagashio Japan 35 3.0k 0.6× 3.4k 0.8× 853 1.0× 228 1.1× 78 0.4× 224 5.0k
Sascha Sadewasser Germany 36 2.8k 0.6× 2.4k 0.6× 1.7k 1.9× 106 0.5× 121 0.6× 139 3.8k
Eng Soon Tok Singapore 31 2.2k 0.5× 2.2k 0.5× 905 1.0× 325 1.5× 283 1.4× 152 3.7k
Yasuhiro Yamada Japan 33 3.4k 0.7× 4.0k 0.9× 901 1.0× 333 1.6× 433 2.1× 126 4.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Roland Scheer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roland Scheer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roland Scheer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roland Scheer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roland Scheer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roland Scheer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roland Scheer. The network helps show where Roland Scheer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roland Scheer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roland Scheer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roland Scheer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roland Scheer. Roland Scheer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gutzler, Rico, Dimitrios Hariskos, H. Kempa, et al.. (2025). Assessment of transparent conductive oxides as back contacts for inline-fabricated Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. Journal of Physics Energy. 7(4). 45018–45018.
2.
Maiberg, Matthias, et al.. (2024). Toward digital twins by one-dimensional simulation of thin-film solar cells: Cu(In,Ga)Se2 as an example. Physical Review Applied. 21(3). 2 indexed citations
3.
Scheer, Roland, et al.. (2024). Effects of quasi-fermi level splitting and band tail states on open circuit voltage towards high-efficiency Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 269. 112767–112767. 2 indexed citations
4.
Schulz, Tobias, et al.. (2023). Structural Evolution of Sequentially Evaporated (Cs,FA)Pb(I,Br)3 Perovskite Thin Films via In Situ X‐Ray Diffraction. physica status solidi (a). 221(3). 6 indexed citations
5.
Kempa, H., et al.. (2023). Sodium in Cu(In, Ga)Se2 Solar Cells: To Be or Not to Be Beneficial. Solar RRL. 8(3). 10 indexed citations
7.
Scheer, Roland, et al.. (2022). Stoichiometry dependent phase evolution of co-evaporated formamidinium and cesium lead halide thin films. Materials Advances. 3(23). 8695–8704. 5 indexed citations
8.
Placidi, Marcel, Ignacio Becerril‐Romero, Robert Fonoll‐Rubio, et al.. (2022). Effects of ITO based back contacts on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films, solar cells, and mini-modules relevant for semi-transparent building integrated photovoltaics. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 251. 112169–112169. 6 indexed citations
9.
Schneider, Thomas, et al.. (2021). Comparison of Mo and ITO back contacts in CIGSe solar cells: Vanishing of the main capacitance step. Progress in Photovoltaics Research and Applications. 30(2). 191–202. 17 indexed citations
10.
Maiberg, Matthias, et al.. (2021). Dominant recombination path in low-bandgap kesterite CZTSe(S) solar cells from red light induced metastability. Journal of Applied Physics. 129(20). 6 indexed citations
12.
Krause, Maximilian, Matthias Maiberg, Philip Jackson, et al.. (2020). Microscopic origins of performance losses in highly efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells. Nature Communications. 11(1). 4189–4189. 102 indexed citations
13.
Caddeo, Francesco, et al.. (2020). Photoelectrochemical properties of Cu-Ga-Se photocathodes with compositions ranging from CuGaSe2 to CuGa3Se5. Electrochimica Acta. 367. 137183–137183. 11 indexed citations
14.
Schneider, Thomas, et al.. (2020). Ultrathin CIGSe Solar Cells with Integrated Structured Back Reflector. Solar RRL. 4(10). 15 indexed citations
15.
Abou‐Ras, Daniel, Sebastián Caicedo‐Dávila, Maximilian Krause, et al.. (2019). No Evidence for Passivation Effects of Na and K at Grain Boundaries in Polycrystalline Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Thin Films for Solar Cells. Solar RRL. 3(8). 20 indexed citations
16.
Grossberg, M., J. Krustok, Charles J. Hages, et al.. (2019). The electrical and optical properties of kesterites. Journal of Physics Energy. 1(4). 44002–44002. 64 indexed citations
17.
Schneider, Thomas, et al.. (2018). Impact of air‐light exposure on the electrical properties of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics Research and Applications. 26(11). 934–941. 12 indexed citations
18.
Körbel, Sabine, et al.. (2016). Research Update: Stable single-phase Zn-rich Cu2ZnSnSe4 through In doping. APL Materials. 4(7). 11 indexed citations
19.
Neisser, A., Christian A. Kaufmann, Roland Scheer, et al.. (2005). Flexible Solar Cells for Space: A New Development Based on Chalcopyrite Thin Films. HZB Repository (Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH (HZB)). 589. 50. 3 indexed citations
20.
Álvarez-Garcı́a, J., B. Barcones, A. Pérez‐Rodríguez, et al.. (2005). 多形CuInC 2 (C=Se,S)カルコゲン化物の振動および結晶特性. Physical Review B. 71(5). 1–54303. 68 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026