Roland Diel
- Infectious Diseases top 0.1%
- Epidemiology top 0.2%
- Surgery top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology
- Immunology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Albert NienhausR. LoddenkemperStefan NiemannKaren Meywald-WalterSabine Rüsch–GerdesChristoph LangeAnja SchablonFelix C. Ringshausen
- Topics
- Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (115 papers)Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (63 papers)Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis (46 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesNature CommunicationsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Roland Diel
135 papers receiving 6.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- Infectious Diseases 5.7k
- Epidemiology 5.1k
- Surgery 3.1k
- Molecular Biology 561
- Immunology 528
Countries citing papers authored by Roland Diel
This map shows the geographic impact of Roland Diel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roland Diel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roland Diel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roland Diel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roland Diel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roland Diel. The network helps show where Roland Diel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roland Diel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roland Diel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roland Diel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roland Diel. Roland Diel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 38 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 111 | |
| 8 | 129 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 88 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 203 | |
| 14 | 268 | |
| 15 | Aktueller Stand der Tuberkulosediagnostik | 17 |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 126 | |
| 18 | Evaluation aktueller Impfstrategien gegen Hepatitis A und B | 1 |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 92 |
About Roland Diel
Roland Diel is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Surgery, having authored 148 papers that have together received 6.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (115 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (63 papers) and Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis (46 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (5.7k citations), Epidemiology (5.1k citations) and Surgery (3.1k citations). Roland Diel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Albert Nienhaus, R. Loddenkemper, Stefan Niemann, Karen Meywald-Walter, Sabine Rüsch–Gerdes, Christoph Lange, Anja Schablon, Felix C. Ringshausen, Thomas A. Kohl and Elvira Richter. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.