Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Multicultural Counseling Competencies and Standards: A Call to the Profession
19921.5k citationsDerald Wing Sue, Patricia Arredondo et al.Journal of Counseling & Developmentprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Roderick J. McDavis
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Roderick J. McDavis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roderick J. McDavis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roderick J. McDavis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roderick J. McDavis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roderick J. McDavis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roderick J. McDavis. The network helps show where Roderick J. McDavis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roderick J. McDavis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roderick J. McDavis.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roderick J. McDavis based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Roderick J. McDavis. Roderick J. McDavis is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
19 of 19 papers shown
1.
McDavis, Roderick J.. (2008). What Ohio U. Learned from a Major IT Crisis.. The chronicle of higher education. 54(30).1 indexed citations
2.
Sue, Derald Wing, Patricia Arredondo, & Roderick J. McDavis. (1992). Multicultural Counseling Competencies and Standards: A Call to the Profession. Journal of Counseling & Development. 70(4). 477–486.1483 indexed citations breakdown →
McDavis, Roderick J.. (1989). Summer Programs: A Method for Retaining Black Graduate Students.. Journal of college student development. 30(3).3 indexed citations
5.
Parker, Woodrow M. & Roderick J. McDavis. (1989). A Personal Development Model for Black Elementary School Students.. Elementary school guidance and counseling. 23(4).3 indexed citations
McDavis, Roderick J.. (1982). Counseling Needs of Handicapped Students and Their Parents.. The School counselor. 29(3).4 indexed citations
9.
McDavis, Roderick J., et al.. (1982). Effects of four orientation approaches on disadvantaged Black freshmen students' attitudes toward the counseling center.. 23(5).10 indexed citations
10.
McDavis, Roderick J., et al.. (1981). White, Black, and Hispanic Students' Perceptions of a Community College Environment.. Journal of College Student Personnel. 22(4).5 indexed citations
McDavis, Roderick J., et al.. (1978). Cuban-American College Students: Needs, Cultural Attitudes, and Vocational Development Program Suggestions.. Journal of College Student Personnel.1 indexed citations
McDavis, Roderick J.. (1976). The Development and Field Testing of an Instrument to Evaluate Student Personnel Programs.. Journal of College Student Personnel.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.