Rocco Capozzi

640 citations
34 papers · 237 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Rocco Capozzi

16 papers receiving 174 citations

Peers

Rocco Capozzi
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • General Arts and Humanities 8
  • Literature and Literary Theory 42
  • Philosophy 39
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 17
  • History and Philosophy of Science 14
Replace Stanley Sadie with:
Stanley Sadie United States
Gary Tomlinson United States
Jane A. Nicholson United Kingdom
Richard Taruskin United States
Jean-Marie Schaeffer France
Eero Tarasti Finland
Edward Larrissy United Kingdom
Jeffrey T. Schnapp United States
Alberto Manguel United States
Carl Dahlhaus Germany
Rocco Capozzi relative to Stanley Sadie United States Stanley Sadie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Stanley Sadie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rocco Capozzi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rocco Capozzi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rocco Capozzi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rocco Capozzi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rocco Capozzi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rocco Capozzi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rocco Capozzi. The network helps show where Rocco Capozzi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Rocco Capozzi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rocco Capozzi Line = papers co-authored together Rocco Capozzi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000140
2 199947
3 199710
4 19896
5 19984
6 20014
7 19934
8 20063
9 20003
10 19912
11 19982
12 19762
13
Relaciones literarias entre Jorge Luis Borges y Umberto Eco
19991
14 19791
15 19891
16 19881
17 19921
18 19811
19 19821
20 19881

About Rocco Capozzi

Rocco Capozzi is a scholar working on General Arts and Humanities, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Artificial Intelligence and Language and Linguistics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 237 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Italian Literature and Culture (11 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (7 papers), Diverse academic and cultural studies (2 papers), Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition (2 papers), Umberto Eco and Semiotics (2 papers), Educational and Social Studies (2 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper) and American and British Literature Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Arts and Humanities (8 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (42 citations), Philosophy (39 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (17 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (14 citations). Rocco Capozzi has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Umberto Eco, William Weaver, Peter Bondanella, Lino Pertile, Stefano Benni, Peter Brand and Massimo Ciavolella. Their work appears in journals such as World Literature Today, Semiotica, Forum Italicum A Journal of Italian Studies, Quaderni d italianistica and University of Toronto Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact