Robyn W. Tucker

538 total citations
8 papers, 410 citations indexed

About

Robyn W. Tucker is a scholar working on Ecology, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Agronomy and Crop Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Robyn W. Tucker has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 410 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Ecology, 2 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and 2 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science. Recurrent topics in Robyn W. Tucker's work include Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (3 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (2 papers) and Wastewater Treatment and Reuse (2 papers). Robyn W. Tucker is often cited by papers focused on Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (3 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (2 papers) and Wastewater Treatment and Reuse (2 papers). Robyn W. Tucker collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Sweden and United States. Robyn W. Tucker's co-authors include Gregory Peters, Hazel V. Rowley, S. G. Wiedemann, Matthias Schulz, Michael D. Short, David J. Roser, Richard M. Stuetz, Stephen G. Wiedemann, Nicholas J. Ashbolt and Stuart J. Khan and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and Environmental Pollution.

In The Last Decade

Robyn W. Tucker

8 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robyn W. Tucker Australia 7 223 144 73 64 40 8 410
Nathan Kemper United States 7 225 1.0× 127 0.9× 79 1.1× 32 0.5× 32 0.8× 22 346
Eugene McGahan Australia 14 303 1.4× 213 1.5× 112 1.5× 37 0.6× 63 1.6× 31 521
Dawn S Chianese United States 6 323 1.4× 152 1.1× 53 0.7× 46 0.7× 21 0.5× 8 453
Vecdi Demircan Türkiye 11 305 1.4× 199 1.4× 51 0.7× 99 1.5× 24 0.6× 58 582
Julia Chatterton United Kingdom 9 215 1.0× 158 1.1× 54 0.7× 27 0.4× 45 1.1× 22 513
C. M. Murphy Australia 11 283 1.3× 212 1.5× 88 1.2× 20 0.3× 61 1.5× 13 419
André Mancebo Mazzetto New Zealand 12 250 1.1× 87 0.6× 46 0.6× 62 1.0× 30 0.8× 24 518
Андре Депперманн Austria 10 143 0.6× 74 0.5× 52 0.7× 31 0.5× 63 1.6× 22 375
M.-J. Yan Ireland 11 415 1.9× 292 2.0× 156 2.1× 36 0.6× 62 1.6× 13 589
Senorpe Asem-Hiablie United States 12 322 1.4× 128 0.9× 93 1.3× 24 0.4× 51 1.3× 20 582

Countries citing papers authored by Robyn W. Tucker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robyn W. Tucker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robyn W. Tucker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robyn W. Tucker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robyn W. Tucker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robyn W. Tucker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robyn W. Tucker. The network helps show where Robyn W. Tucker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robyn W. Tucker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robyn W. Tucker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robyn W. Tucker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robyn W. Tucker. Robyn W. Tucker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Mehta, Chirag M., Robyn W. Tucker, R. J. Davis, et al.. (2016). Nutrients in Australian agro-industrial residues: production, characteristics and mapping. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management. 23(2). 206–222. 14 indexed citations
2.
Coleman, Heather M., Trang Trinh, Nhat Le-Minh, et al.. (2013). Occurrence of ectoparasiticides in Australian beef cattle feedlot wastes. Environmental Pollution. 174. 265–272. 11 indexed citations
3.
Peters, Gregory, S. G. Wiedemann, Hazel V. Rowley, et al.. (2011). Assessing agricultural soil acidification and nutrient management in life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 16(5). 431–441. 25 indexed citations
4.
Peters, Gregory, Hazel V. Rowley, S. G. Wiedemann, et al.. (2010). Red Meat Production in Australia: Life Cycle Assessment and Comparison with Overseas Studies. Environmental Science & Technology. 44(4). 1327–1332. 179 indexed citations
5.
Peters, Gregory, Stephen G. Wiedemann, Hazel V. Rowley, & Robyn W. Tucker. (2010). Accounting for water use in Australian red meat production. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 15(3). 311–320. 69 indexed citations
6.
Klein, M., et al.. (2010). Diversity and Abundance of Zoonotic Pathogens and Indicators in Manures of Feedlot Cattle in Australia. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 76(20). 6947–6950. 30 indexed citations
7.
Khan, Stuart J., David J. Roser, Cheryl M. Davies, et al.. (2007). Chemical contaminants in feedlot wastes: Concentrations, effects and attenuation. Environment International. 34(6). 839–859. 76 indexed citations
8.
Tucker, Robyn W., et al.. (1993). Waste Minimization in Cattle Feedlots by Ration Modification. Transactions of the ASAE. 36(5). 1461–1466. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026