Eugene McGahan

635 total citations
31 papers, 521 citations indexed

About

Eugene McGahan is a scholar working on Ecology, Environmental Engineering and Process Chemistry and Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, Eugene McGahan has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 521 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Ecology, 12 papers in Environmental Engineering and 7 papers in Process Chemistry and Technology. Recurrent topics in Eugene McGahan's work include Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (15 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (11 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (7 papers). Eugene McGahan is often cited by papers focused on Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (15 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (11 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (7 papers). Eugene McGahan collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Ireland and United States. Eugene McGahan's co-authors include S. G. Wiedemann, C. M. Murphy, M.-J. Yan, Beverley Henry, S.F. Ledgard, Greg Thoma, Tim Grant, Stephen G. Wiedemann, Timothy Grant and Priscilla F. Gerber and has published in prestigious journals such as Bioresource Technology, Journal of Cleaner Production and Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment.

In The Last Decade

Eugene McGahan

30 papers receiving 481 citations

Peers

Eugene McGahan

ECOLO

ASZ

PCT

Senorpe Asem-Hiablie United States

C. M. Murphy Australia

Stefan Hörtenhuber Austria

Graham A. McAuliffe United Kingdom

Dawn S Chianese United States

Aimable Uwizeye Italy

Robyn W. Tucker Australia

Nathan Kemper United States

S. G. Wiedemann Australia

Giampiero Grossi Italy

Senorpe Asem-Hiablie United States

Eugene McGahan

322 ×1.1

ECOLO

128 ×0.6

93 ×0.8

73 ×1.0

ASZ

32 ×0.5

PCT

Citations per year, relative to Eugene McGahan Eugene McGahan (= 1×) peers Senorpe Asem-Hiablie

Countries citing papers authored by Eugene McGahan

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eugene McGahan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eugene McGahan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eugene McGahan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eugene McGahan

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eugene McGahan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eugene McGahan. The network helps show where Eugene McGahan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eugene McGahan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eugene McGahan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eugene McGahan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eugene McGahan. Eugene McGahan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

McGahan, Eugene, Tatiane Yanes, Jennifer Berkman, et al.. (2025). Utility of Germline, Somatic and ctDNA Testing in Adults With Cancer. Cancer Medicine. 14(15). e71080–e71080.

McGahan, Eugene, David Milne, Bronwyn Terrill, et al.. (2025). Empowering human research ethics committees to review genomics applications: evaluating the utility of a custom online education resource. European Journal of Human Genetics. 33(7). 945–955. 1 indexed citations

Wiedemann, S. G., et al.. (2023). Environmental impacts of the Australian poultry industry. 2. Egg production. Animal Production Science. 63(5). 505–521. 3 indexed citations

McGahan, Eugene, et al.. (2021). Best practice litter management manual for Australian meat chicken farms : Covering fresh, in-shed, reuse and spent litter management. Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries archive of scientific and research publications (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries). 1 indexed citations

Gerber, Priscilla F., et al.. (2020). Potential contaminants and hazards in alternative chicken bedding materials and proposed guidance levels: a review. Poultry Science. 99(12). 6664–6684. 21 indexed citations

Wiedemann, S. G., et al.. (2018). Establishing soil nutrient distribution zones across free range egg farms to guide practical nutrient management strategies. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 257. 20–29. 8 indexed citations

Wiedemann, S. G., Eugene McGahan, & C. M. Murphy. (2017). Environmental impacts and resource use from Australian pork production determined using life cycle assessment. 2. Energy, water and land occupation. Animal Production Science. 58(6). 1153–1163. 20 indexed citations

Wiedemann, S. G., et al.. (2016). Nitrous oxide, ammonia and methane from Australian meat chicken houses measured under commercial operating conditions and with mitigation strategies applied. Animal Production Science. 56(9). 1404–1417. 18 indexed citations

Wiedemann, S. G., Eugene McGahan, & C. M. Murphy. (2016). Environmental impacts and resource use from Australian pork production assessed using life-cycle assessment. 1. Greenhouse gas emissions. Animal Production Science. 56(9). 1418–1431. 26 indexed citations

10.

McGahan, Eugene, Frances Phillips, S. G. Wiedemann, et al.. (2016). Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions from an Australian piggery with short and long hydraulic retention-time effluent storage. Animal Production Science. 56(9). 1376–1389. 10 indexed citations

11.

McGahan, Eugene, et al.. (2015). Breakdown of electrical energy use during summer and winter at six piggeries. Animal Production Science. 55(12). 1463–1463. 1 indexed citations

12.

McGahan, Eugene, et al.. (2015). Validation of PigBal model predictions for pig manure production. Animal Production Science. 56(7). 1081–1090. 5 indexed citations

13.

Wiedemann, S. G., Eugene McGahan, C. M. Murphy, et al.. (2015). Environmental impacts and resource use of Australian beef and lamb exported to the USA determined using life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 94. 67–75. 75 indexed citations

14.

Wiedemann, S. G., et al.. (2010). Environmental assessment of two pork supply chains using life cycle assessment. University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland). 37 indexed citations

15.

Wiedemann, Stephen G., et al.. (2010). Life cycle assessment of two Australian pork supply chains. University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland). 3 indexed citations

16.

Hudson, N., et al.. (2006). Odour emissions from anaerobic piggery ponds. 2: Improving estimates of emission rate through recognition of spatial variability. Bioresource Technology. 98(10). 1888–1897. 6 indexed citations

17.

Hudson, N., et al.. (2006). Odour emissions from anaerobic piggery ponds. 1. Results of a three season, 14-month survey. Bioresource Technology. 98(10). 1877–1887. 13 indexed citations

18.

Chinivasagam, H.N., Robert J. Thomas, Kenneth D. Casey, et al.. (2004). Microbiological status of piggery effluent from 13 piggeries in the south east Queensland region of Australia. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 97(5). 883–891. 30 indexed citations

19.

McGahan, Eugene, et al.. (2002). NUISANCE CRITERIA FOR IMPACT ASSESSMENT. 2 indexed citations

20.

McGahan, Eugene, et al.. (2002). STRATEGIES TO REDUCE ODOUR EMISSIONS FROM MEAT CHICKEN FARMS. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact