Robin Heijmen

981 citations
8 papers · 198 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Robin Heijmen

8 papers receiving 193 citations

Peers

Robin Heijmen
Comparison fields: 5 of 16
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 164
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 141
  • Internal Medicine 15
  • Epidemiology 80
  • Surgery 51
Replace Magdalena Erlebach with:
Magdalena Erlebach Germany
Jan‐Hendrik Nürnberg Germany
Herbert Kroon Netherlands
Carmelo Sgroi Italy
Thijmen W. Hokken Netherlands
Antoine Guédès Belgium
Giuseppe Iaci Italy
Andrea Picci Italy
Emily Perdoncin United States
Yen Ho United Kingdom
Robin Heijmen relative to Magdalena Erlebach Germany Magdalena Erlebach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Magdalena Erlebach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robin Heijmen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robin Heijmen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robin Heijmen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robin Heijmen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robin Heijmen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robin Heijmen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robin Heijmen. The network helps show where Robin Heijmen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robin Heijmen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robin Heijmen Line = papers co-authored together Robin Heijmen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 201394
2 201679
3 20148
4
Chronic type A dissection in a pulmonary autograft.
20077
5 20215
6 20243
7 20241
8 20251

About Robin Heijmen

Robin Heijmen is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery and Internal Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 198 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (5 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (3 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (2 papers), Vascular Procedures and Complications (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (1 paper) and Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (164 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (141 citations), Internal Medicine (15 citations), Epidemiology (80 citations) and Surgery (51 citations). Robin Heijmen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Marco Barbanti, David Wood, Stefan Toggweiler, Jonathon Leipsic, Ronald K. Binder, Mélanie Freeman, John G. Webb, Pierre Alric, Jean Noël Fabiani and Hans‐Henning Eckstein. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA Network Open, Journal of Vascular Surgery, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, Annals of Vascular Surgery and Netherlands Heart Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact