Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives
19991.1k citationsP. Aleotti, Robin ChowdhuryBulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environmentprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robin Chowdhury
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robin Chowdhury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robin Chowdhury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robin Chowdhury more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robin Chowdhury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robin Chowdhury. The network helps show where Robin Chowdhury may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robin Chowdhury
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robin Chowdhury.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robin Chowdhury based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robin Chowdhury. Robin Chowdhury is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Chowdhury, Robin & Phil Flentje. (2014). Mitigation of landslide impacts, strategies and challenges for the 21st century. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 1(1). 1–13.5 indexed citations
6.
Chowdhury, Robin & Phil Flentje. (2010). Geotechnical analysis of slopes and landslides: achievements and challenges. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 1.1 indexed citations
7.
Flentje, Phil, et al.. (2010). Periodic and continuous landslide monitoring to assess landslide frequency – selected Australian examples. Research Online (University of Wollongong).2 indexed citations
Flentje, Phil, et al.. (2000). A Matrix Approach For Assessing Landslide Risk In The Context Of A Comprehensive Strategy. ISRM International Symposium.2 indexed citations
11.
Flentje, Phil & Robin Chowdhury. (1999). Quantitative Landslide Hazard Assessment in an Urban Area. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 115.9 indexed citations
12.
Aleotti, P. & Robin Chowdhury. (1999). Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. 58(1). 21–44.1126 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Chowdhury, Robin & Phil Flentje. (1998). Effective urban landslide hazard assessment. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 1.12 indexed citations
14.
Flentje, Phil & Robin Chowdhury. (1996). Preparation and validation of digital maps of geology and slope instability. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 1.2 indexed citations
Chowdhury, Robin. (1980). LANDSLIDES AS NATURAL HAZARDS - MECHANISMS AND UNCERTAINTIES. 11(2).3 indexed citations
20.
Chowdhury, Robin, et al.. (1971). FINITE ELEMENT SOLUTION FOR QUANTITY OF STEADY SEEPAGE. 66(785).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.