Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Landslide hazard and risk zonation—why is it still so difficult?
2005971 citationsC.J. van Westen, Th.W.J. van Asch et al.Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environmentprofile →
Use of Geomorphological Information in Indirect Landslide Susceptibility Assessment
2003547 citationsC.J. van Westen, N. Rengers et al.Natural Hazardsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Soeters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Soeters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Soeters more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Soeters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Soeters. The network helps show where R. Soeters may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Soeters
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Soeters.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Soeters based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. Soeters. R. Soeters is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Westen, C.J. van, Th.W.J. van Asch, & R. Soeters. (2005). Landslide hazard and risk zonation—why is it still so difficult?. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. 65(2). 167–184.971 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Westen, C.J. van, N. Rengers, & R. Soeters. (2003). Use of Geomorphological Information in Indirect Landslide Susceptibility Assessment. Natural Hazards. 30(3). 399–419.547 indexed citations breakdown →
Soeters, R. & C.J. van Westen. (1994). Slope instability : the role of remote sensing and GIS in recognition, analysis and zonation. University of Twente Research Information. 97–108.3 indexed citations
5.
Westen, C.J. van, R. Soeters, & N. Rengers. (1994). GISSIZ : training package for the use of Geographical Information Systems in slope instability zonation. University of Twente Research Information. 10.5 indexed citations
6.
Westen, C.J. van, et al.. (1994). Evaluating the use of training areas in bivariate statistical landslide hazard analysis : a case study in Colombia. University of Twente Research Information. 292–300.38 indexed citations
7.
Westen, C.J. van, R. Soeters, & N. Rengers. (1994). GISSIZ : training package Geographical Information Systems in slope instability zonation. University of Twente Research Information.
Gómez, H., et al.. (1975). An inundation study of the Lower Magdalena-Cauca River Basin. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.