Countries citing papers authored by Roberto Sebastiani
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Roberto Sebastiani's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberto Sebastiani with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberto Sebastiani more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roberto Sebastiani
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberto Sebastiani. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberto Sebastiani. The network helps show where Roberto Sebastiani may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roberto Sebastiani
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roberto Sebastiani.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roberto Sebastiani based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Roberto Sebastiani. Roberto Sebastiani is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sebastiani, Roberto, et al.. (2006). Encoding the satisfiability of modal and description logics into SAT: the case study of K(m)/ALC. Unitn Eprints Research (Università Degli Studi di Trento).1 indexed citations
8.
Bruttomesso, Roberto, et al.. (2006). To Ackermann-ize or not to Ackermann-ize? On Efficiently Handling Uninterpreted Function Symbols in SMT (EUF ∪ T).3 indexed citations
9.
Giorgini, Paolo, et al.. (2004). Formal Reasoning Techniques for Goal Models.1 indexed citations
Audemard, Gilles, Alessandro Cimatti, Artur Korniłowicz, & Roberto Sebastiani. (2002). SAT-Based Bounded Model Checking for Timed Systems. Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento).5 indexed citations
12.
Audemard, Gilles, Piergiorgio Bertoli, Alessandro Cimatti, Artur Korniłowicz, & Roberto Sebastiani. (2002). A SAT Based Approach for Solving Formulas over Boolean and Linear Mathematical Propositions. Unitn Eprints Research (Università Degli Studi di Trento).18 indexed citations
Giunchiglia, Enrico, Fausto Giunchiglia, Roberto Sebastiani, & Armando Tacchella. (1998). More Evaluation of Decision Procedures for Modal Logics.. Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento). 626–635.21 indexed citations
15.
Giunchiglia, Enrico, et al.. (1998). Act, and the rest will follow: exploiting determinism in planning as satisfiability. Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento). 948–953.28 indexed citations
16.
Bundy, Alan, Fausto Giunchiglia, Roberto Sebastiani, & Toby Walsh. (1996). Computing abstraction hierarchies by numerical simulation. Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh). 523–529.3 indexed citations
17.
Giunchiglia, Fausto & Roberto Sebastiani. (1996). A SAT-based decision procedure for ALC. Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento). 304–314.35 indexed citations
Villafiorita, Adolfo & Roberto Sebastiani. (1994). Proof Planning By Abstraction. Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.