Roberto Diletti

6.0k total citations
177 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Roberto Diletti is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Roberto Diletti has authored 177 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 155 papers in Surgery, 125 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 80 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Roberto Diletti's work include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (153 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (80 papers) and Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (76 papers). Roberto Diletti is often cited by papers focused on Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (153 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (80 papers) and Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (76 papers). Roberto Diletti collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Italy. Roberto Diletti's co-authors include Patrick W. Serruys, Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, Felix Zijlstra, Robert‐Jan van Geuns, Vasim Farooq, Yoshinobu Onuma, Héctor M. García‐García, Joost Daemen, Evelyn Regar and Christos V. Bourantas and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

In The Last Decade

Roberto Diletti

163 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Roberto Diletti Netherlands	31	2.3k	1.8k	1.2k	788	218	177	2.7k
Vasim Farooq Netherlands	38	3.5k 1.5×	2.7k 1.5×	1.8k 1.5×	1.1k 1.4×	238 1.1×	115	4.1k
Peter Barlis Australia	29	2.1k 0.9×	1.2k 0.7×	1.1k 0.9×	868 1.1×	513 2.4×	108	2.6k
Bernardo Cortese Italy	27	2.3k 1.0×	1.7k 1.0×	940 0.8×	1.1k 1.4×	96 0.4×	229	2.9k
Kengo Tanabe Japan	36	4.2k 1.8×	3.0k 1.7×	1.9k 1.6×	1.4k 1.8×	209 1.0×	124	4.7k
Giuseppe Ferrante Italy	27	1.4k 0.6×	1.2k 0.7×	461 0.4×	686 0.9×	149 0.7×	87	2.2k
Martin B. Leon United States	24	2.0k 0.9×	1.3k 0.7×	1.2k 1.0×	802 1.0×	88 0.4×	59	2.3k
Shigeru Nakamura Japan	29	3.5k 1.6×	2.4k 1.4×	2.0k 1.7×	1.2k 1.5×	211 1.0×	133	4.0k
Remo Albiero Italy	33	3.0k 1.3×	2.1k 1.2×	1.8k 1.5×	1.5k 1.9×	115 0.5×	81	3.6k
Jean‐Jácques Goy Switzerland	28	1.9k 0.8×	1.9k 1.1×	740 0.6×	687 0.9×	128 0.6×	122	2.9k
Tom Adriaenssens Belgium	25	1.6k 0.7×	2.2k 1.2×	745 0.6×	555 0.7×	425 1.9×	131	3.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Roberto Diletti

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roberto Diletti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberto Diletti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberto Diletti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roberto Diletti

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberto Diletti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberto Diletti. The network helps show where Roberto Diletti may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roberto Diletti

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roberto Diletti. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roberto Diletti based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roberto Diletti. Roberto Diletti is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Neleman, Tara, Alessandra Scoccia, Isabella Kardys, et al.. (2024). Fractional Flow Reserve Directed Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Optimization Using High‐Definition Intravascular Ultrasound in Non‐ST‐Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Versus Chronic Coronary Syndrome. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 106(1). 12–22.

Dekker, Wijnand K. den, Johan Bennett, Manel Sabaté, et al.. (2024). Immediate versus staged complete revascularisation in patients presenting with STEMI and multivessel disease. EuroIntervention. 20(14). e865–e875. 1 indexed citations

Neleman, Tara, Alessandra Scoccia, Jürgen Ligthart, et al.. (2023). Culprit lesion plaque characterization and thrombus grading by high‐definition intravascular ultrasound in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 102(2). 191–199. 3 indexed citations

Kardys, Isabella, Rutger Nuis, Jeroen Wilschut, et al.. (2023). Propensity Matched Comparison of Clinical Outcome After Immediate Versus Staged Complete Revascularization in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Multivessel Disease. The American Journal of Cardiology. 202. 6–11. 4 indexed citations

Paradies, Valeria, Adrian Banning, Davide Cao, et al.. (2023). Provisional Strategy for Left Main Stem Bifurcation Disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 16(7). 743–758. 10 indexed citations

Kardys, Isabella, Jeroen Wilschut, Joost Daemen, et al.. (2023). Stent expansion in calcified coronary chronic total occlusions: The impact of different stent platforms. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 102(3). 451–463. 1 indexed citations

Masdjedi, Kaneshka, Tara Neleman, Laurens J.C. van Zandvoort, et al.. (2022). Three-dimensional QCA-based vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) in Heart Team decision-making: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study. BMJ Open. 12(4). e054202–e054202. 2 indexed citations

Scoccia, Alessandra, Tara Neleman, Rutger‐Jan Nuis, et al.. (2022). Vessel fractional flow reserve-based non-culprit lesion reclassification in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Impact on treatment strategy and clinical outcome (FAST STEMI I study). International Journal of Cardiology. 373. 33–38. 5 indexed citations

Diletti, Roberto, Kaneshka Masdjedi, Joost Daemen, et al.. (2021). Impact of Poststenting Fractional Flow Reserve on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes. Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions. 14(3). e009681–e009681. 31 indexed citations

10.

Neleman, Tara, Kaneshka Masdjedi, Laurens J.C. van Zandvoort, et al.. (2021). TCT-301 Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 78(19). B124–B124. 1 indexed citations

11.

Wilschut, Jeroen, et al.. (2019). Management of Septal Branch Perforation and Septal Hematoma During Retrograde Treatment of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Using Fat Embolization. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 36(6). 966.e15–966.e17. 2 indexed citations

12.

Daemen, Joost, Kaneshka Masdjedi, Matthew Mercieca Balbi, et al.. (2019). 100.54 Extended Validation of Novel 3-Dimensional Quantitative Coronary Angiography (3D-QCA) Based Software to Calculate Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR): The Fast Extend Study. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 12(4). S17–S17. 4 indexed citations

13.

Otsuka, Kenichiro, Martin Villiger, Αντώνιος Καρανάσος, et al.. (2019). INTRAVASCULAR POLARIMETRY CHARACTERIZES PLAQUE COMPOSITION AND INSTABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 73(9). 72–72. 2 indexed citations

14.

Everaert, Bert, Joanna J. Wykrzykowska, Jacques Koolen, et al.. (2017). Recommendations for the use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in percutaneous coronary interventions. Netherlands Heart Journal. 25(7-8). 419–428. 5 indexed citations

15.

Fam, Jiang Ming, Roberto Diletti, Yuki Ishibashi, et al.. (2016). Mid- to Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Patients Treated With the Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 9(16). 1652–1663. 21 indexed citations

16.

Onuma, Yoshinobu, Yuki Ishibashi, Bert Everaert, et al.. (2015). TCT-527 Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Patients Treated With The Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold. The BVS Expand Study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 66(15). B215–B215. 2 indexed citations

17.

Zhang, Yao‐Jun, Nai‐Liang Tian, Shengjie Dong, et al.. (2014). Impact of biodegradable versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents on clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 15 randomized trials. Chinese Medical Journal. 127(11). 2159–2166. 5 indexed citations

18.

Diletti, Roberto, Vasim Farooq, Takashi Muramatsu, et al.. (2012). Serial 2- and 3-Dimensional Visualization of Side Branch Jailing After Metallic Stent Implantation. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 5(10). 1089–1090. 4 indexed citations

19.

Gómez‐Lara, Josep, Salvatore Brugaletta, Vasim Farooq, et al.. (2011). Head-to-Head Comparison of the Neointimal Response Between Metallic and Bioresorbable Everolimus-Eluting Scaffolds Using Optical Coherence Tomography. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 4(12). 1271–1280. 51 indexed citations

20.

Diletti, Roberto, Héctor M. García‐García, Josep Gómez‐Lara, et al.. (2011). Assessment of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression and Regression at Bifurcations Using Combined IVUS and OCT. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 4(7). 774–780. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact