Roberto Contino

8.9k total citations · 4 hit papers
39 papers, 3.7k citations indexed

About

Roberto Contino is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Roberto Contino has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 3.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 17 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 3 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in Roberto Contino's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (37 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (21 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (17 papers). Roberto Contino is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (37 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (21 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (17 papers). Roberto Contino collaborates with scholars based in Italy, Switzerland and Spain. Roberto Contino's co-authors include Alex Pomarol, Kaustubh Agashe, Leandro Da Rold, Yasunori Nomura, Riccardo Rattazzi, Aleksandr Azatov, Margherita Ghezzi, Christophe Grojean, Giuliano Panico and Margarete Mühlleitner and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nuclear Physics B and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

Roberto Contino

38 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Hit Papers

The minimal composite Higgs model 2003 2026 2010 2018 2005 2003 2006 2007 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Roberto Contino Italy 25 3.6k 1.4k 92 71 38 39 3.7k
R. Sekhar Chivukula United States 30 3.6k 1.0× 1.2k 0.9× 73 0.8× 69 1.0× 42 1.1× 142 3.6k
José Santiago Spain 29 2.2k 0.6× 1.0k 0.7× 107 1.2× 36 0.5× 34 0.9× 67 2.2k
Giuliano Panico Italy 26 1.9k 0.5× 719 0.5× 43 0.5× 79 1.1× 40 1.1× 43 2.0k
Bohdan Grza̧dkowski Poland 28 3.2k 0.9× 890 0.7× 82 0.9× 74 1.0× 89 2.3× 108 3.2k
Ulrich Haisch Germany 29 3.0k 0.8× 705 0.5× 44 0.5× 89 1.3× 43 1.1× 69 3.0k
P. Perez United States 33 2.8k 0.8× 968 0.7× 45 0.5× 64 0.9× 27 0.7× 101 2.8k
Kaustubh Agashe United States 30 4.2k 1.2× 1.8k 1.3× 73 0.8× 50 0.7× 25 0.7× 70 4.2k
Tianjun Li China 24 2.2k 0.6× 1.0k 0.7× 71 0.8× 100 1.4× 16 0.4× 124 2.2k
Martin Gorbahn United Kingdom 25 2.5k 0.7× 302 0.2× 42 0.5× 59 0.8× 29 0.8× 38 2.5k
W. Hollik Germany 28 2.2k 0.6× 560 0.4× 32 0.3× 68 1.0× 40 1.1× 71 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Roberto Contino

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roberto Contino's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberto Contino with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberto Contino more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roberto Contino

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberto Contino. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberto Contino. The network helps show where Roberto Contino may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roberto Contino

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roberto Contino. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roberto Contino based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roberto Contino. Roberto Contino is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Contino, Roberto, et al.. (2025). A novel strategy to prove chiral symmetry breaking in QCD-like theories. Physics Letters B. 862. 139367–139367. 3 indexed citations
2.
Contino, Roberto, et al.. (2025). On the proof of chiral symmetry breaking through anomaly matching in QCD-like theories: An exemplification. Nuclear Physics B. 1017. 116957–116957.
3.
Contino, Roberto, et al.. (2024). Proof of chiral symmetry breaking from anomaly matching in QCD-like theories. Physical review. D. 110(11). 3 indexed citations
4.
Contino, Roberto, et al.. (2022). Chiral models of composite axions and accidental Peccei-Quinn symmetry. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2022(4). 18 indexed citations
5.
Contino, Roberto, et al.. (2017). Precision tests and fine tuning in twin Higgs models. Physical review. D. 96(9). 25 indexed citations
6.
Contino, Roberto, et al.. (2015). One-loop effects from spin-1 resonances in Composite Higgs models. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2015(7). 30 indexed citations
7.
Contino, Roberto, et al.. (2015). Dispersion relations for electroweak observables in composite Higgs models. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 92(11). 6 indexed citations
8.
Contino, Roberto, Margherita Ghezzi, Christophe Grojean, Margarete Mühlleitner, & Michael Spira. (2014). eHDECAY: An implementation of the Higgs effective Lagrangian into HDECAY. Computer Physics Communications. 185(12). 3412–3423. 41 indexed citations
9.
Azatov, Aleksandr, et al.. (2013). New prospects for Higgs compositeness inhZγ. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 88(7). 40 indexed citations
10.
Contino, Roberto, Margherita Ghezzi, M. Moretti, et al.. (2012). Anomalous couplings in double Higgs production. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2012(8). 89 indexed citations
11.
Contino, Roberto, Duccio Pappadopulo, David Marzocca, & Riccardo Rattazzi. (2011). On the effect of resonances in composite Higgs phenomenology. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2011(10). 112 indexed citations
12.
Agashe, Kaustubh & Roberto Contino. (2009). Composite Higgs-mediated flavor-changing neutral current. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 80(7). 72 indexed citations
13.
Contino, Roberto, Leandro Da Rold, & Alex Pomarol. (2007). Light custodians in natural composite Higgs models. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 75(5). 376 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Contino, Roberto & Alex Pomarol. (2007). The holographic composite Higgs. Comptes Rendus Physique. 8(9). 1058–1067. 4 indexed citations
15.
Agashe, Kaustubh, Roberto Contino, Leandro Da Rold, & Alex Pomarol. (2006). A custodial symmetry for Zbb¯. Physics Letters B. 641(1). 62–66. 399 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Agashe, Kaustubh, Roberto Contino, & Raman Sundrum. (2005). Top Compositeness and Precision Unification. Physical Review Letters. 95(17). 171804–171804. 58 indexed citations
17.
Agashe, Kaustubh, Roberto Contino, & Alex Pomarol. (2005). The minimal composite Higgs model. Nuclear Physics B. 719(1-2). 165–187. 833 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Contino, Roberto, Yasunori Nomura, & Alex Pomarol. (2003). Higgs as a holographic pseudo-Goldstone boson. Nuclear Physics B. 671. 148–174. 425 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Contino, Roberto & Luigi Pilo. (2001). A note on regularization methods in Kaluza–Klein theories. Physics Letters B. 520(3-4). 357–360. 2 indexed citations
20.
Contino, Roberto & Ignazio Scimemi. (1999). The supersymmetric-flavor problem for heavy first-two-generation scalars at next-to-leading order. The European Physical Journal C. 10(2). 347–356. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026