Countries citing papers authored by Roberta Bracciale
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Roberta Bracciale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberta Bracciale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberta Bracciale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roberta Bracciale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberta Bracciale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberta Bracciale. The network helps show where Roberta Bracciale may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roberta Bracciale
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roberta Bracciale.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roberta Bracciale based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Roberta Bracciale. Roberta Bracciale is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bracciale, Roberta, et al.. (2020). Information Disorder: acceleratori tecnologici e dinamiche sociali. CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa). 11. 58–72.5 indexed citations
6.
Bracciale, Roberta, et al.. (2019). Digital Hyperleaders. Communication Strategies on Social Networks at the 2019 European Elections. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.5 indexed citations
Mazzoleni, Gianpietro & Roberta Bracciale. (2019). La politica pop online. I meme e le nuove sfide della comunicazione politica. CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa).18 indexed citations
9.
Bracciale, Roberta, et al.. (2018). Hybrid 2018 campaigning: the social media habits of Italian political leaders and parties. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.10 indexed citations
Bracciale, Roberta, et al.. (2018). La self-personalization dei leader politici su Twitter. Tra professionalizzazione e intimizzazione. CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa). 61–86.4 indexed citations
Andretta, Massimiliano & Roberta Bracciale. (2017). Social Media Campaigning: le elezioni regionali in #Toscana2015. CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa).1 indexed citations
14.
Bracciale, Roberta & Antonio Martella. (2016). Tweeting habits of Italian media outlets. CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa). 505–540.2 indexed citations
15.
Bracciale, Roberta, et al.. (2016). Political Information on Twitter: #elezioni2013 and the role of gatekeeper citizens. CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa). 209–225.1 indexed citations
Bracciale, Roberta, et al.. (2015). Digital Divide in Time of Crisis in Europe: do the Rich get Richer, the Poor get Poorer?. CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa). 41–57.2 indexed citations
18.
Bracciale, Roberta. (2010). Donne nella rete. Disuguaglianze digitali di genere. CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa).7 indexed citations
19.
Bracciale, Roberta, et al.. (2009). La e-inclusion e le competenze digitali: il contesto Europeo e il caso dell’Italia. CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa). 179–246.1 indexed citations
20.
Bracciale, Roberta, et al.. (2002). Le strategie di comunicazione esterna delle università italiane. CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa). 13–15.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.