Robert W. Booth

559 total citations
27 papers, 307 citations indexed

About

Robert W. Booth is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert W. Booth has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 307 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 8 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Robert W. Booth's work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (14 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers). Robert W. Booth is often cited by papers focused on Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (14 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers). Robert W. Booth collaborates with scholars based in Türkiye, United Kingdom and United States. Robert W. Booth's co-authors include Dinkar Sharma, Ulrich Weger, Rupert Brown, Pascal Huguet, Bundy Mackintosh, Müjde Peker, Olesya Blazhenkova, Sirous Mobini, S. Moinian and K.K. Ng and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Personality and Individual Differences and Memory & Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Robert W. Booth

25 papers receiving 303 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert W. Booth Türkiye 8 145 138 71 66 44 27 307
Vladimir Kosonogov Russia 10 125 0.9× 144 1.0× 112 1.6× 74 1.1× 25 0.6× 48 353
Tanja S. H. Wingenbach United Kingdom 8 160 1.1× 135 1.0× 92 1.3× 84 1.3× 25 0.6× 15 311
Eric S. Allard United States 9 192 1.3× 182 1.3× 104 1.5× 54 0.8× 42 1.0× 19 399
David R. Herring United States 8 202 1.4× 144 1.0× 90 1.3× 43 0.7× 24 0.5× 10 345
Isa Rutten Belgium 7 101 0.7× 241 1.7× 88 1.2× 96 1.5× 15 0.3× 7 344
Susanna Payne United Kingdom 5 86 0.6× 176 1.3× 69 1.0× 167 2.5× 36 0.8× 8 331
Molly Sands United States 4 137 0.9× 138 1.0× 148 2.1× 33 0.5× 22 0.5× 6 322
Hanna Drimalla Germany 6 103 0.7× 72 0.5× 99 1.4× 43 0.7× 16 0.4× 15 239
Lotte Veenstra Netherlands 8 94 0.6× 115 0.8× 164 2.3× 100 1.5× 14 0.3× 9 323
Szymon Wichary Poland 9 78 0.5× 53 0.4× 73 1.0× 29 0.4× 17 0.4× 15 271

Countries citing papers authored by Robert W. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert W. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert W. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert W. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert W. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert W. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert W. Booth. The network helps show where Robert W. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert W. Booth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert W. Booth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert W. Booth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert W. Booth. Robert W. Booth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Booth, Robert W., et al.. (2024). The best possible self task has direct effects on expectancies and mood, and an indirect effect on anxiety symptom severity.. Emotion. 25(4). 964–971. 1 indexed citations
2.
Booth, Robert W., et al.. (2023). Probability bias is an independent correlate of depressive symptoms. Motivation and Emotion. 47(4). 638–649. 4 indexed citations
3.
Blazhenkova, Olesya, et al.. (2022). Masked emotions: Do face mask patterns and colors affect the recognition of emotions?. Cognitive Research Principles and Implications. 7(1). 33–33. 17 indexed citations
4.
Booth, Robert W., et al.. (2022). Estimated probabilities of positive, vs. negative, events show separable correlations with COVID-19 preventive behaviours. Personality and Individual Differences. 191. 111576–111576.
5.
Booth, Robert W. & Dinkar Sharma. (2021). Biased probability estimates in trait anxiety and trait depression are unrelated to biased availability. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 73. 101672–101672. 4 indexed citations
6.
Blazhenkova, Olesya & Robert W. Booth. (2020). Individual differences in visualization and childhood play preferences. Heliyon. 6(6). e03953–e03953. 3 indexed citations
7.
Booth, Robert W., et al.. (2019). Individual Differences in Anxiety and Worry, Not Anxiety Disorders, Predict Weakened Executive Control: Preliminary Evidence. Revista internacional de psicología y terapia psicológica. 19(3). 337–344. 3 indexed citations
8.
Booth, Robert W., et al.. (2019). A relationship between weak attentional control and cognitive distortions, explained by negative affect. PLoS ONE. 14(4). e0215399–e0215399. 6 indexed citations
9.
Peker, Müjde, et al.. (2018). Relationships among self‐construal, gender, social dominance orientation, and interpersonal distance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 48(9). 494–505. 6 indexed citations
10.
Booth, Robert W.. (2016). Brief time course of trait anxiety-related attentional bias to fear-conditioned stimuli: Evidence from the dual-RSVP task. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 54. 71–76. 1 indexed citations
11.
Booth, Robert W., Bundy Mackintosh, & Dinkar Sharma. (2016). Working memory regulates trait anxiety-related threat processing biases.. Emotion. 17(4). 616–627. 17 indexed citations
12.
Booth, Robert W., et al.. (2016). Turkish adaptation of the Fear of Spiders Questionnaire: Reliability and validity in non-clinical samples. Cogent Psychology. 3(1). 1144250–1144250. 5 indexed citations
13.
Booth, Robert W., et al.. (2015). The age of anxiety? It depends where you look: changes in STAI trait anxiety, 1970–2010. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 51(2). 193–202. 40 indexed citations
14.
Peker, Müjde, et al.. (2015). Perceived self-society moral discrepancies predict depression but not anxiety. Asian Journal Of Social Psychology. 18(4). 337–342. 3 indexed citations
15.
Peker, Müjde, et al.. (2015). Looking good or doing good? Motivations for organisational citizenship behaviour in Turkish versus South Korean collectivists. International Journal of Psychology. 51(3). 238–242. 1 indexed citations
16.
Booth, Robert W.. (2014). Uncontrolled avoidance of threat: Vigilance-avoidance, executive control, inhibition and shifting. Cognition & Emotion. 28(8). 1465–1473. 16 indexed citations
17.
Booth, Robert W. & Ulrich Weger. (2012). The function of regressions in reading: Backward eye movements allow rereading. Memory & Cognition. 41(1). 82–97. 52 indexed citations
18.
Sharma, Dinkar, Robert W. Booth, Rupert Brown, & Pascal Huguet. (2010). Exploring the temporal dynamics of social facilitation in the Stroop task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 17(1). 52–58. 55 indexed citations
19.
Booth, Robert W., et al.. (2002). Modeling of correlated noise in RF bipolar devices. 2. 941–944.
20.
Booth, Robert W.. (1989). An Evaluation of the LCF Theorem Prover using LOTOS. 83–99. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026