Robert Tyson
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology
- General Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Joseph SandlerHansi KennedyAnna FreudSheldon I. MillerPhyllis TysonRobert Morris OgdenDavid P. KatzPeter Reder
- Topics
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (12 papers)Child Therapy and Development (5 papers)Psychiatric care and mental health services (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Robert Tyson
25 papers receiving 210 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Clinical Psychology 233
- Social Psychology 53
- General Psychology 32
- Psychiatry and Mental health 29
- Sociology and Political Science 26
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Tyson
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Tyson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Tyson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Tyson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Tyson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Tyson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Tyson. The network helps show where Robert Tyson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Tyson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Tyson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Tyson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Tyson. Robert Tyson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Analysis of the under-five child | 3 |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | The technique of child psychoanalysis | 14 |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | [Problems in the selection of patients for psychoanalysis. The application of the concepts "indication", "aptitude" and "analyzability"]. | 3 |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 40 |
About Robert Tyson
Robert Tyson is a scholar working on General Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Transplantation, having authored 30 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (12 papers), Child Therapy and Development (5 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (32 citations), Clinical Psychology (233 citations) and Applied Psychology (19 citations). Robert Tyson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Sandler, Hansi Kennedy, Anna Freud, Sheldon I. Miller, Phyllis Tyson, Robert Morris Ogden, David P. Katz, Peter Reder, Owen Renik and Robert S. Wallerstein. Their work appears in journals such as American Psychologist, The American Journal of Psychology and Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.