Robert Stephens

5.8k citations
49 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 16

Robert Stephens

47 papers receiving 965 citations

Peers

Robert Stephens
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Nephrology 247
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 146
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 368
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 43
  • Surgery 288
Replace Bing-Cheng Zhao with:
Bing-Cheng Zhao China
Roberta Hines United States
Lajos Bogár Hungary
Sandor A. Friedman United States
Evgeni Brotfain Israel
Alexander Krannich Germany
Christopher H.E. Imray United Kingdom
Else Tønnesen Denmark
Kanji Uchida Japan
Emma Borrelli Italy
Robert Stephens relative to Bing-Cheng Zhao China Bing-Cheng Zhao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.7×
Bing-Cheng Zhao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Stephens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Stephens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Stephens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Stephens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Stephens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Stephens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Stephens. The network helps show where Robert Stephens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Stephens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Stephens Line = papers co-authored together Robert Stephens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20242
3 20231
4 202312
5 20173
6 20172
7 201760
8 20166
9 201619
10 20139
11 201326
12 20124
13 20125
14 20101
15 201033
16 20093
17 200782
18
Randomized controlled trial of balanced versus sodium chloride based intravenous solutions in the elderly surgical patient
20001
19 20007
20 1989118

About Robert Stephens

Robert Stephens is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nephrology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (22 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (12 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (6 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (5 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (5 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (4 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (4 papers) and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (247 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (146 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (368 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (43 citations) and Surgery (288 citations). Robert Stephens has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Michael G. Mythen, Tim Peachey, Susan Mallett, Rex L. Woolf, Nicholas J. Wilkes, Hugh Montgomery, Bambos M. Charalambous, Ian M. Feavers, Gareth L. Ackland and John Whittle. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, CHEST Journal, Open Heart, Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology and Anaesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026