Robert Stalker

499 total citations
51 papers, 382 citations indexed

About

Robert Stalker is a scholar working on Ocean Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Biomaterials. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert Stalker has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 382 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Ocean Engineering, 32 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 19 papers in Biomaterials. Recurrent topics in Robert Stalker's work include Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (31 papers), Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques (23 papers) and Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition (18 papers). Robert Stalker is often cited by papers focused on Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (31 papers), Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques (23 papers) and Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition (18 papers). Robert Stalker collaborates with scholars based in United Arab Emirates, Japan and United States. Robert Stalker's co-authors include G. M. Graham, I. R. Collins, Ralf Warmuth, A.M. Beatty, Gordon Graham, Bing Li, Deborah Bowering, Amarpreet Kaur, Christer B. Aakeröy and M. M. Jordan and has published in prestigious journals such as Tetrahedron, SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry and SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control.

In The Last Decade

Robert Stalker

46 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert Stalker United Arab Emirates 11 203 198 182 59 52 51 382
M. H. Al-Khaldi United States 13 271 1.3× 83 0.4× 270 1.5× 22 0.4× 69 1.3× 32 401
Jonathan W. Pittman United States 5 116 0.6× 23 0.1× 99 0.5× 17 0.3× 54 1.0× 6 342
Catherine M. Kirkland United States 12 81 0.4× 66 0.3× 38 0.2× 23 0.4× 66 1.3× 28 435
Paul H. Krumrine United States 12 326 1.6× 35 0.2× 215 1.2× 14 0.2× 98 1.9× 25 412
Seppo Kasa Finland 10 33 0.2× 187 0.9× 38 0.2× 20 0.3× 35 0.7× 16 367
M. D. Yuan United Kingdom 12 210 1.0× 318 1.6× 184 1.0× 128 2.2× 77 1.5× 25 457
Julio Cesar Guedes Correia Brazil 12 59 0.3× 19 0.1× 115 0.6× 159 2.7× 75 1.4× 27 339
Kwang Soon Moon United States 3 30 0.1× 42 0.2× 183 1.0× 260 4.4× 18 0.3× 4 345
Martin Bartošek Italy 15 538 2.7× 20 0.1× 373 2.0× 4 0.1× 187 3.6× 49 625
Andrey A. Elkin Russia 5 41 0.2× 55 0.3× 9 0.0× 38 0.6× 9 0.2× 10 391

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Stalker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Stalker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Stalker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Stalker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Stalker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Stalker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Stalker. The network helps show where Robert Stalker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Stalker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Stalker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Stalker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Stalker. Robert Stalker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Yonebayashi, Hideharu, et al.. (2024). Engineered Low Salinity Waterflood in Carbonate Reservoirs?Boosting Fluid-fluid Interaction and Oil Recovery by Cost Effective Additives. International Petroleum Technology Conference. 10 indexed citations
3.
Yonebayashi, Hideharu, et al.. (2024). Engineered Low Salinity Waterflood in Carbonate Reservoirs: Part-2-Boosting Fluid-Fluid Interaction and Oil Recovery by Cost Effective Additives. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. 3 indexed citations
5.
Simpson, Caroline E., et al.. (2022). Corrosion Inhibitor Screening and the Impact of Additives. 1–15. 1 indexed citations
6.
Kaur, Amarpreet, et al.. (2019). A Placement Case Study for a Well in the North Sea Field. SPE International Conference on Oilfield Chemistry. 1 indexed citations
7.
Kaur, Amarpreet, Dario M. Frigo, Robert Stalker, & G. M. Graham. (2017). Understanding Fluid Transport Mechanisms of Fracture Shale Formations by Modelling Squeeze Treatments. SPE International Conference on Oilfield Chemistry. 2 indexed citations
8.
Kaur, Amarpreet, et al.. (2016). Modelling Squeeze Treatments in Fractured Systems - A Case History. 5 indexed citations
10.
Graham, G. M., et al.. (2014). Correlation of Shear and Turbulence on Scale Formation and Inhibition. 3 indexed citations
11.
Graham, G. M., et al.. (2013). Scale and Scale Inhibition Challenges for an Alkaline Surfactant Polymer Flood in a Seawater Flooded Reservoir. SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry. 7 indexed citations
12.
Stalker, Robert, et al.. (2012). Modelling Squeeze Treatments of Fractured Reservoir Zones. 7 indexed citations
13.
14.
Graham, G. M., et al.. (2008). Scale Challenges in Talisman's Varg Field. 10 indexed citations
16.
Stalker, Robert, et al.. (2005). Downhole Scale Formation and Inhibition in Mild Sulphate Scaling Conditions. SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026