Robert Slagter
- Human-Computer Interaction top 2%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Roel VertegaalAnton NijholtGerrit C. van der VeerTill SchümmerStephan LukoschAlbert SomitSteven A. PetersonHans Schaffers
- Topics
- Speech and dialogue systems (4 papers)Social Robot Interaction and HRI (4 papers)Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (3 papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Cooperative Information SystemsPolitics and the Life SciencesData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Robert Slagter
10 papers receiving 320 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Human-Computer Interaction 148
- Social Psychology 135
- Artificial Intelligence 106
- Cognitive Neuroscience 72
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 52
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Slagter
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Slagter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Slagter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Slagter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Slagter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Slagter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Slagter. The network helps show where Robert Slagter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Slagter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Slagter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Slagter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Slagter. Robert Slagter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Web 2.0 technologies and workplace paradigms to enable e-professional workstyles | 2 |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | Service Orchestration for Collaboration Patterns | 2 |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 273 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 7 |
About Robert Slagter
Robert Slagter is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Management Information Systems and Social Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Speech and dialogue systems (4 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (4 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (148 citations), Social Psychology (135 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (52 citations). Robert Slagter has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Roel Vertegaal, Anton Nijholt, Gerrit C. van der Veer, Till Schümmer, Stephan Lukosch, Albert Somit, Steven A. Peterson, Hans Schaffers, Andrew Jones and Patricia Wolf. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, Politics and the Life Sciences and Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.