Robert Schoch

3.6k citations
21 papers · 2.3k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 12

Robert Schoch

21 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Hit Papers

Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventiona...1.8k200920262014202050010001.5k

Peers

Robert Schoch
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Hematology 1.7k
  • Genetics 604
  • Molecular Biology 972
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 352
  • Oncology 282
Replace P. Wijermans with:
P. Wijermans Netherlands
Anna Tamburini Italy
Musa Yılmaz United States
S. Faderl United States
Fumiharu Yagasaki Japan
Hiroto Miwa Japan
Françoise Picard France
Angelo Guerrasio Italy
Tomas Ahlgren Sweden
Michal Bar‐Natan United States
Robert Schoch relative to P. Wijermans Netherlands P. Wijermans's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
P. Wijermans · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Schoch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Schoch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Schoch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Schoch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Schoch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Schoch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Schoch. The network helps show where Robert Schoch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Schoch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Schoch Line = papers co-authored together Robert Schoch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III studybreakdown →
20091756
2 20074
3 200774
4
Successful autologous stem cell transplantation in a severely immunocompromised patient with relapsed AIDS-related B-cell lymphoma.
20063
5 20061
6 200536
7 20039
8 200283
9 200114
10 20013
11 200110
12 199843
13 199820
14 199715
15 199741
16 19974
17 19973
18 199615
19 199649
20 19889

About Robert Schoch

Robert Schoch is a scholar working on Hematology, Genetics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (7 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (6 papers), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (6 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (6 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (3 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes (2 papers) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (1.7k citations), Genetics (604 citations) and Molecular Biology (972 citations). Robert Schoch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Aristoteles Giagounidis, Carlo Finelli, Pierre Fenaux, Eva Hellström‐Lindberg, Valeria Santini, Jay T. Backstrom, David R. McKenzie, Alan F. List, John C. Byrd and Norbert Gattermann. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Haematology, Blood, British Journal of Cancer, Oncology Reports and Transfusion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026