Robert S. Porter

617 total citations
14 papers, 400 citations indexed

About

Robert S. Porter is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert S. Porter has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 400 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Molecular Biology, 5 papers in Genetics and 1 paper in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Robert S. Porter's work include Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (6 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (4 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (4 papers). Robert S. Porter is often cited by papers focused on Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (6 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (4 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (4 papers). Robert S. Porter collaborates with scholars based in United States, Russia and India. Robert S. Porter's co-authors include Patricija van Oosten‐Hawle, Richard I. Morimoto, Shigeki Iwase, Justin L. Kaplan, Christina N. Vallianatos, Alan P. Boyle, Shengcheng Dong, Young Ah Seo, Natalie C. Tronson and Yali Dou and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

Robert S. Porter

14 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers

Robert S. Porter
Lamia Mestek United Kingdom
Nirav M. Amin United States
Fernando E. Santiago United States
Rafael Sênos Demarco United States
Andrew M. Pickering United States
Melanie Weigert United States
Lamia Mestek United Kingdom
Robert S. Porter
Citations per year, relative to Robert S. Porter Robert S. Porter (= 1×) peers Lamia Mestek

Countries citing papers authored by Robert S. Porter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert S. Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert S. Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert S. Porter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert S. Porter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert S. Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert S. Porter. The network helps show where Robert S. Porter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert S. Porter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert S. Porter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert S. Porter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert S. Porter. Robert S. Porter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Porter, Robert S., Sojin An, Bo Zhou, et al.. (2025). Coordinated neuron-specific splicing events restrict nucleosome engagement of the LSD1 histone demethylase complex. Cell Reports. 44(1). 115213–115213. 2 indexed citations
2.
Porter, Robert S., et al.. (2024). Neuronal splicing of the unmethylated histone H3K4 reader, PHF21A, prevents excessive synaptogenesis. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 300(11). 107881–107881. 3 indexed citations
3.
Porter, Robert S. & Shigeki Iwase. (2023). Modulation of chromatin architecture influences the neuronal nucleus through activity-regulated gene expression. Biochemical Society Transactions. 51(2). 703–713. 2 indexed citations
4.
Gayen, Srimonta, Clair Harris, Emily Maclary, et al.. (2022). Activation of Xist by an evolutionarily conserved function of KDM5C demethylase. Nature Communications. 13(1). 2602–2602. 26 indexed citations
5.
Agarwal, Saurabh, Emily Brookes, Robert S. Porter, et al.. (2021). KDM1A maintains genome-wide homeostasis of transcriptional enhancers. Genome Research. 31(2). 186–197. 14 indexed citations
6.
Vallianatos, Christina N., Robert S. Porter, Young Ah Seo, et al.. (2020). Mutually suppressive roles of KMT2A and KDM5C in behaviour, neuronal structure, and histone H3K4 methylation. Communications Biology. 3(1). 278–278. 33 indexed citations
7.
Dong, Shengcheng, et al.. (2019). Predicting the effects of SNPs on transcription factor binding affinity. Bioinformatics. 36(2). 364–372. 36 indexed citations
8.
Porter, Robert S., et al.. (2017). Transcriptome Analysis Revealed Impaired cAMP Responsiveness in PHF21A-Deficient Human Cells. Neuroscience. 370. 170–180. 8 indexed citations
9.
Porter, Robert S., et al.. (2017). Greener, Brighter. Academic Medicine. 92(6). 772–772. 1 indexed citations
10.
Porter, Robert S., et al.. (2017). Neuron-specific alternative splicing of transcriptional machineries: Implications for neurodevelopmental disorders. Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience. 87. 35–45. 51 indexed citations
11.
Oosten‐Hawle, Patricija van, Robert S. Porter, & Richard I. Morimoto. (2013). Regulation of Organismal Proteostasis by Transcellular Chaperone Signaling. Cell. 153(6). 1366–1378. 163 indexed citations
12.
Porter, Robert S. & Justin L. Kaplan. (2011). The Merck manual of diagnosis and therapy, 19th ed.. 15 indexed citations
13.
Bond, Bradley J., et al.. (2007). Norms for Teasing among College Students. Communication Research Reports. 24(2). 169–176. 14 indexed citations
14.
Porter, Robert S.. (1971). Private investment in developing countries. Long Range Planning. 4(1). 58–62. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026