Robert M’barek

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
44 papers, 823 citations indexed

About

Robert M’barek is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Strategy and Management and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert M’barek has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 823 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 8 papers in Strategy and Management and 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Robert M’barek's work include Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development (25 papers), Biotechnology and Related Fields (7 papers) and Agricultural Economics and Policy (6 papers). Robert M’barek is often cited by papers focused on Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development (25 papers), Biotechnology and Related Fields (7 papers) and Agricultural Economics and Policy (6 papers). Robert M’barek collaborates with scholars based in Spain, Netherlands and Germany. Robert M’barek's co-authors include Tévécia Ronzon, George Philippidis, Stephan Piotrowski, Emanuele Ferrari, Michael Carus, Hans van Meijl, Martina Sartori, Justus Wesseler, Myrna van Leeuwen and Johannes Sauer and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews and Journal of Cleaner Production.

In The Last Decade

Robert M’barek

40 papers receiving 779 citations

Hit Papers

Development of the Circular Bioeconomy: Drivers and Indic... 2021 2026 2022 2024 2021 50 100 150

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert M’barek Spain 15 453 270 141 115 83 44 823
Tévécia Ronzon Spain 12 477 1.1× 284 1.1× 140 1.0× 84 0.7× 55 0.7× 25 697
Marianne Kettunen United Kingdom 9 318 0.7× 383 1.4× 74 0.5× 82 0.7× 48 0.6× 18 961
Stephan Piotrowski Germany 11 360 0.8× 192 0.7× 88 0.6× 56 0.5× 87 1.0× 19 535
B. Allen Finland 6 362 0.8× 381 1.4× 67 0.5× 77 0.7× 56 0.7× 6 914
Niina Kautto Sweden 4 382 0.8× 180 0.7× 104 0.7× 66 0.6× 77 0.9× 10 608
Neus Escobar Spain 13 130 0.3× 141 0.5× 66 0.5× 231 2.0× 125 1.5× 26 803
Lara Dammer Germany 7 231 0.5× 156 0.6× 39 0.3× 54 0.5× 107 1.3× 17 534
Nita Viorel Italy 7 234 0.5× 144 0.5× 48 0.3× 137 1.2× 255 3.1× 12 835
Meghan O’Brien Germany 13 191 0.4× 182 0.7× 36 0.3× 226 2.0× 115 1.4× 29 784
Marko Lovrić Finland 17 294 0.6× 226 0.8× 41 0.3× 49 0.4× 29 0.3× 46 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M’barek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M’barek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M’barek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M’barek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M’barek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M’barek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M’barek. The network helps show where Robert M’barek may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert M’barek

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert M’barek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert M’barek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert M’barek. Robert M’barek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Acs, Szvetlana, João Costa Leite, Esther Sanyé‐Mengual, et al.. (2025). Towards sustainable food systems: developing a monitoring framework for the EU. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 8. 1 indexed citations
2.
Rokicki, Bartłomiej, et al.. (2025). European green bonds, carbon tax and crowding-out: The economic, social and environmental impacts of the EU's green investments under different financing scenarios. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 211. 115330–115330. 5 indexed citations
3.
Barreiro‐Hurlé, Jesús, Thomas Fellmann, & Robert M’barek. (2024). Modelling in Support of Better Agricultural and Food Policies: the JRC's Integrated Agro‐economic Modelling platform (iMAP). EuroChoices. 23(1). 43–53. 2 indexed citations
4.
Ronzon, Tévécia, Michael Carus, Kutay Cingiz, et al.. (2024). Assessing the bioeconomy’s contribution to evidence-based policy: A comparative analysis of value added measurements. Econstor (Econstor). 13(4). 317–331.
6.
M’barek, Robert & Justus Wesseler. (2023). The Rapid Development of Bioeconomy Policies in the EU and other Regions of the World. EuroChoices. 22(3). 5–12. 4 indexed citations
7.
Grassano, Nicola, et al.. (2023). Bioeconomy and resilience to economic shocks: insights from the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Econstor (Econstor). 12(4). 367–377. 2 indexed citations
8.
Philippidis, George, Robert M’barek, & Willem‐Jan van Zeist. (2023). Bioeconomy Transition Pathways – Potential Impacts for the EU Bio‐based Chemicals Sector. EuroChoices. 22(3). 28–36. 2 indexed citations
9.
Sartori, Martina, Emanuele Ferrari, Robert M’barek, et al.. (2023). Remaining Loyal to Our Soil: A Prospective Integrated Assessment of Soil Erosion on Global Food Security. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
10.
Cingiz, Kutay, Roel Delahaye, Wim Heijman, et al.. (2021). Development of the Circular Bioeconomy: Drivers and Indicators. Sustainability. 13(1). 413–413. 191 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Baldoni, Edoardo, George Philippidis, Tijs M. Lammens, et al.. (2021). Getting your hands dirty: A data digging exercise to unearth the EU's bio-based chemical sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 143. 110895–110895. 6 indexed citations
12.
Kuosmanen, Timo, et al.. (2020). How big is the bioeconomy? Reflections from aneconomic perspective. Jukuri (Luonnonvarakeskus Tietopalvelu). 1 indexed citations
14.
Ronzon, Tévécia, et al.. (2020). Developments of Economic Growth and Employment in Bioeconomy Sectors across the EU. Sustainability. 12(11). 4507–4507. 67 indexed citations
15.
Philippidis, George, Lindsay Shutes, Robert M’barek, et al.. (2020). Snakes and ladders: World development pathways’ synergies and trade-offs through the lens of the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Cleaner Production. 267. 122147–122147. 43 indexed citations
16.
Philippidis, George, Martina Sartori, Emanuele Ferrari, & Robert M’barek. (2019). Waste not, want not: A bio-economic impact assessment of household food waste reductions in the EU. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 146. 514–522. 76 indexed citations
17.
Ronzon, Tévécia & Robert M’barek. (2018). Socioeconomic Indicators to Monitor the EU’s Bioeconomy in Transition. Sustainability. 10(6). 1745–1745. 101 indexed citations
18.
M’barek, Robert, et al.. (2018). Brief on jobs and growth of the bioeconomy 2009-2015. 2 indexed citations
19.
Cardenete, Manuel Alejandro, et al.. (2014). AGRI‐FOOD AND BIO‐BASED ANALYSIS IN THE SPANISH ECONOMY USING A KEY SECTOR APPROACH. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies. 26(2). 112–134. 16 indexed citations
20.
Blanco, María, Andrej Ceglar, Robert M’barek, et al.. (2013). "Still a challenge - interaction of biophysical and economic models for crop production and market analysis". 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026