Robert M. Strong

427 citations
15 papers · 290 indexed · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Robert M. Strong

12 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers

Robert M. Strong
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Biological Psychiatry 35
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 29
  • Rheumatology 84
  • Clinical Biochemistry 35
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 77
Replace J. Folkard with:
J. Folkard United Kingdom
E Delacoux France
P. Vecsei Germany
Jarbas S. Roriz‐Filho Brazil
Lúcia Marques Vianna Brazil
Mary Lee United States
Valerie J. Benford United States
Desheng Zhai China
Brittany Simpson United States
Matías Monsalves‐Álvarez Chile
Robert M. Strong relative to J. Folkard United Kingdom J. Folkard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
J. Folkard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Strong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Strong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Strong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Strong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Strong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Strong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Strong. The network helps show where Robert M. Strong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Robert M. Strong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert M. Strong Line = papers co-authored together Robert M. Strong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 20050
2 20050
3 20052
4 20013
5 19932
6
Database Management in Medicine and Health Policy Research: MEDUS/A
19802
7 19742
8 1973138
9 197315
10
Erythrocyte aminotransferase activities in women using oral contraceptives and the effect of vitamin B 6 supplementation.
197342
11 19732
12 19737
13 197269
14 19682
15 19654

About Robert M. Strong

Robert M. Strong is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Information Systems and Management, Pharmacy, Nephrology and Biochemistry, having authored 15 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (2 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (2 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (2 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (1 paper), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (1 paper), Nursing Roles and Practices (1 paper), Speech and dialogue systems (1 paper) and Reproductive System and Pregnancy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (35 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (29 citations), Rheumatology (84 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (35 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (77 citations). Robert M. Strong has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Peter Adams, David P. Rose, J. Folkard, V. Wynn, Mary Seed, P. E. Harding, Rose Dp, A. J. Liedtke, Charles W. Urschel and J. D. Acland. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Pathology, Pediatric Clinics of North America, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026