Robert M. Steinman

5.6k total citations
53 papers, 3.6k citations indexed

About

Robert M. Steinman is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert M. Steinman has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 3.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 13 papers in Human-Computer Interaction and 10 papers in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in Robert M. Steinman's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (38 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (13 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (7 papers). Robert M. Steinman is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (38 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (13 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (7 papers). Robert M. Steinman collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Austria. Robert M. Steinman's co-authors include Eileen Kowler, Alexander A. Skavenski, H. Collewijn, Genevieve M. Haddad, Casper J. Erkelens, Julie Epelboim, Zygmunt Pizlo, George T. Timberlake, James R. Booth and Barbara J. Winterson and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Vision Research and Journal of the Optical Society of America A.

In The Last Decade

Robert M. Steinman

53 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert M. Steinman United States 36 2.8k 694 546 524 462 53 3.6k
Casper J. Erkelens Netherlands 36 3.7k 1.3× 786 1.1× 603 1.1× 723 1.4× 228 0.5× 100 4.5k
Ian P. Howard Canada 32 3.0k 1.1× 383 0.6× 485 0.9× 369 0.7× 152 0.3× 85 3.8k
B. Fischer Germany 35 4.6k 1.6× 314 0.5× 336 0.6× 479 0.9× 468 1.0× 56 5.2k
Eileen Kowler United States 42 5.2k 1.8× 568 0.8× 1.1k 2.1× 516 1.0× 561 1.2× 74 6.2k
Leland S. Stone United States 33 2.5k 0.9× 495 0.7× 174 0.3× 672 1.3× 394 0.9× 102 3.1k
J.A.M. Van Gisbergen Netherlands 35 3.1k 1.1× 288 0.4× 313 0.6× 931 1.8× 220 0.5× 63 3.6k
Lorrin A. Riggs United States 30 2.2k 0.8× 726 1.0× 195 0.4× 159 0.3× 655 1.4× 74 3.2k
Bruce Bridgeman United States 45 6.0k 2.1× 458 0.7× 555 1.0× 514 1.0× 418 0.9× 173 7.0k
Douglas Tweed Canada 32 2.1k 0.7× 664 1.0× 347 0.6× 1.3k 2.5× 159 0.3× 66 3.5k
Susana T. L. Chung United States 33 3.1k 1.1× 646 0.9× 446 0.8× 178 0.3× 272 0.6× 149 4.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Steinman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Steinman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Steinman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Steinman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Steinman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Steinman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Steinman. The network helps show where Robert M. Steinman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert M. Steinman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert M. Steinman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert M. Steinman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert M. Steinman. Robert M. Steinman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Li, Yunfeng, Zygmunt Pizlo, & Robert M. Steinman. (2008). A computational model that recovers the 3D shape of an object from a single 2D retinal representation. Vision Research. 49(9). 979–991. 54 indexed citations
2.
Pizlo, Zygmunt, Robert M. Steinman, & Yunfeng Li. (2008). Binocular disparity only comes into play when everything else fails; a finding with broader implications than one might suppose. Spatial Vision. 21(6). 495–508. 13 indexed citations
3.
Pizlo, Zygmunt, et al.. (2003). One fixates accurately in order to see clearly not because one sees clearly. Spatial Vision. 16(3). 225–241. 15 indexed citations
4.
Logvinenko, Alexander D., Julie Epelboim, & Robert M. Steinman. (2001). The role of vergence in the perception of distance: a fair test of Bishop Berkeley's claim. Spatial Vision. 15(1). 77–97. 10 indexed citations
5.
Epelboim, Julie, et al.. (2000). Characteristics of saccades and vergence in two kinds of sequential looking tasks. Vision Research. 40(16). 2083–2090. 41 indexed citations
6.
Steinman, Robert M., Zygmunt Pizlo, & Filip Pizlo. (2000). Phi is not beta, and why Wertheimer’s discovery launched the Gestalt revolution. Vision Research. 40(17). 2257–2264. 57 indexed citations
7.
Epelboim, Julie, Robert M. Steinman, Eileen Kowler, et al.. (1997). Gaze-shift dynamics in two kinds of sequential looking tasks. Vision Research. 37(18). 2597–2607. 93 indexed citations
8.
Epelboim, Julie, et al.. (1997). Fillers and spaces in text: The importance of word recognition during reading. Vision Research. 37(20). 2899–2914. 50 indexed citations
9.
Erkelens, Casper J., et al.. (1997). Trajectories of the Human Binocular Fixation Point during Conjugate and Non-conjugate Gaze-shifts. Vision Research. 37(8). 1049–1069. 95 indexed citations
10.
Epelboim, Julie, James R. Booth, & Robert M. Steinman. (1996). Much ado about nothing: the place of space in text. Vision Research. 36(3). 465–470. 22 indexed citations
11.
Epelboim, Julie, Robert M. Steinman, Eileen Kowler, et al.. (1995). The function of visual search and memory in sequential looking tasks. Vision Research. 35(23-24). 3401–3422. 109 indexed citations
12.
Steinman, Robert M., Eileen Kowler, & H. Collewijn. (1990). New directions for oculomotor research. Vision Research. 30(11). 1845–1864. 71 indexed citations
13.
Steinman, Robert M., John Z. Levinson, H. Collewijn, & J. van der Steen. (1983). Vision in the presence of known natural retinal-image motion (A). Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 73. 1856. 2 indexed citations
14.
Steinman, Robert M.. (1982). Naming and evidence. Philosophical Studies. 41(2). 179–192. 1 indexed citations
15.
Winterson, Barbara J., H. Collewijn, & Robert M. Steinman. (1979). Compensatory eye movements to miniature rotations in the rabbit: Implications for retinal image stability. Vision Research. 19(10). 1155–1159. 13 indexed citations
16.
Steinman, Robert M. & H. Collewijn. (1978). How our two eyes are held steady (A). Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 68. 1359. 3 indexed citations
17.
Winterson, Barbara J. & Robert M. Steinman. (1978). The effect of luminance on human smooth pursuit of perifoveal and foveal targets. Vision Research. 18(9). 1165–1172. 71 indexed citations
18.
Murphy, Brian J., Eileen Kowler, & Robert M. Steinman. (1975). Slow oculomotor control in the presence of moving backgrounds. Vision Research. 15(11). 1263–1268. 70 indexed citations
19.
Skavenski, Alexander A., David A. Robinson, Robert M. Steinman, & George T. Timberlake. (1975). Miniature eye movements of fixation in rhesus monkey. Vision Research. 15(11). 1269–IN7. 49 indexed citations
20.
Sansbury, Richard V., Alexander A. Skavenski, Genevieve M. Haddad, & Robert M. Steinman. (1973). Normal fixation of eccentric targets*. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 63(5). 612–612. 54 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026