Robert M. Steinman

5.6k citations
53 papers · 3.6k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Robert M. Steinman

53 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Robert M. Steinman
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.8k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 546
  • Ophthalmology 694
  • Neurology 524
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 311
Replace Casper J. Erkelens with:
Casper J. Erkelens Netherlands
Ian P. Howard Canada
B. Fischer Germany
Bruce Bridgeman United States
Lorrin A. Riggs United States
Eileen Kowler United States
Douglas Tweed Canada
I. P. Howard Canada
Susana T. L. Chung United States
Suzanne P. McKee United States
Robert M. Steinman relative to Casper J. Erkelens Netherlands Casper J. Erkelens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Casper J. Erkelens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Steinman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Steinman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Steinman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Steinman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Steinman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Steinman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Steinman. The network helps show where Robert M. Steinman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Robert M. Steinman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert M. Steinman Line = papers co-authored together Robert M. Steinman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1973343
2 1965285
3 1967190
4 1980174
5 1979173
6 1995153
7 1979146
8 1970134
9 1980111
10 1995109
11 1981104
12 199795
13 199793
14 197392
15 196976
16 197373
17 199471
18 199071
19 197871
20 197570

About Robert M. Steinman

Robert M. Steinman is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction, Ophthalmology, Neurology and Social Psychology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (38 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (13 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (7 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (5 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (2.8k citations), Human-Computer Interaction (546 citations), Ophthalmology (694 citations), Neurology (524 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (311 citations). Robert M. Steinman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Eileen Kowler, Alexander A. Skavenski, H. Collewijn, Genevieve M. Haddad, Casper J. Erkelens, Julie Epelboim, Zygmunt Pizlo, George T. Timberlake, James R. Booth and Barbara J. Winterson. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, Science, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Philosophical Studies and Mind.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact