Robert M. Rush

1.3k total citations
40 papers, 985 citations indexed

About

Robert M. Rush is a scholar working on Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Emergency Medical Services. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert M. Rush has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 985 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Surgery, 16 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and 11 papers in Emergency Medical Services. Recurrent topics in Robert M. Rush's work include Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (15 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (10 papers) and Disaster Response and Management (9 papers). Robert M. Rush is often cited by papers focused on Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (15 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (10 papers) and Disaster Response and Management (9 papers). Robert M. Rush collaborates with scholars based in United States, Norway and Germany. Robert M. Rush's co-authors include James Sebesta, Matthew J. Martin, Benjamin W. Starnes, Edward D. Arrington, Alec C. Beekley, Scott R. Steele, Charles A. Andersen, Tommy A. Brown, Alec Beekley and Ronald J. Place and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Journal of Surgery, Journal of the American College of Surgeons and World Journal of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Robert M. Rush

39 papers receiving 945 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert M. Rush United States 18 443 372 351 155 146 40 985
Alec Beekley United States 17 799 1.8× 467 1.3× 314 0.9× 84 0.5× 55 0.4× 32 1.3k
Guy Lin Israel 17 435 1.0× 417 1.1× 195 0.6× 151 1.0× 42 0.3× 39 894
Heiko Trentzsch Germany 16 332 0.7× 554 1.5× 131 0.4× 71 0.5× 175 1.2× 83 976
Gregory K. Luna United States 17 500 1.1× 660 1.8× 321 0.9× 40 0.3× 124 0.8× 30 1.2k
Wayne Meredith United States 21 971 2.2× 1.1k 2.9× 106 0.3× 48 0.3× 157 1.1× 39 1.8k
Mansoor Khan United Kingdom 14 383 0.9× 491 1.3× 356 1.0× 32 0.2× 50 0.3× 69 893
David L. Ciraulo United States 20 688 1.6× 448 1.2× 131 0.4× 172 1.1× 128 0.9× 37 1.2k
Ernesto A. Pretto United States 23 455 1.0× 468 1.3× 168 0.5× 436 2.8× 138 0.9× 87 1.3k
Enrique Diaz‐Guzman United States 20 372 0.8× 244 0.7× 75 0.2× 47 0.3× 123 0.8× 57 1.5k
Joseph F. Rappold United States 16 384 0.9× 363 1.0× 216 0.6× 41 0.3× 72 0.5× 41 792

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Rush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Rush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Rush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Rush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Rush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Rush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Rush. The network helps show where Robert M. Rush may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert M. Rush

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert M. Rush. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert M. Rush based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert M. Rush. Robert M. Rush is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Plackett, Timothy P., et al.. (2019). Development of a Field-Expedient Vascular Trauma Simulator. Journal of Special Operations Medicine. 19(2). 73–73. 1 indexed citations
2.
Plackett, Timothy P., et al.. (2018). Achieving Mastery of General Surgery Operative Skill in the Army Healthcare System. Military Medicine. 184(3-4). e279–e284. 6 indexed citations
3.
Hart, Danielle, Robert M. Rush, Gregory Rule, et al.. (2017). Training and Assessing Critical Airway, Breathing, and Hemorrhage Control Procedures for Trauma Care: Live Tissue Versus Synthetic Models. Academic Emergency Medicine. 25(2). 148–167. 19 indexed citations
4.
Sebesta, James, et al.. (2016). What Patients Really Want: Optimizing the Military Preoperative Evaluation Clinic. Military Medicine. 181(3). 236–242. 2 indexed citations
5.
Causey, Marlin Wayne, et al.. (2013). Operating room efficiency improvement after implementation of a postoperative team assessment. Journal of Surgical Research. 180(1). 15–20. 42 indexed citations
6.
Walker, Avery S., et al.. (2013). What is the Real Cost of an Overnight Stay After an Ambulatory General Surgical Procedure?. Military Medicine. 178(6). 665–668. 2 indexed citations
7.
Causey, Marlin Wayne, Robert M. Rush, Randy Kjorstad, & James Sebesta. (2012). Factors influencing humanitarian care and the treatment of local patients within the deployed military medical system: casualty referral limitations. The American Journal of Surgery. 203(5). 574–577. 9 indexed citations
8.
Rush, Robert M., et al.. (2012). Intensive Skills Week for Military Medical Students Increases Technical Proficiency, Confidence, and Skills to Minimize Negative Stress. Journal of Special Operations Medicine. 12(4). 45–45. 12 indexed citations
9.
Eckert, Matthew J., et al.. (2010). Incidence of low vitamin A levels and ocular symptoms after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 6(6). 653–657. 39 indexed citations
10.
Lehmann, R, et al.. (2009). Resectional gastric bypass outcomes in active duty soldiers: a retrospective review. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 5(6). 657–661. 4 indexed citations
11.
Steele, Scott R., Tommy A. Brown, Robert M. Rush, & Matthew J. Martin. (2007). Laparoscopic vs Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer: Results from a Large Nationwide Population-based Analysis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 12(3). 583–591. 99 indexed citations
12.
Kjorstad, Randy, Benjamin W. Starnes, Edward D. Arrington, et al.. (2007). Application of the Mangled Extremity Severity Score in a Combat Setting. Military Medicine. 172(7). 777–781. 54 indexed citations
13.
Kjorstad, Randy, et al.. (2006). The use of damage-control principles for penetrating pelvic battlefield trauma. The American Journal of Surgery. 191(5). 604–609. 44 indexed citations
14.
Rush, Robert M., et al.. (2006). The Army Forward Surgical Team: Update and Lessons Learned, 1997–2004. Military Medicine. 171(4). 269–272. 24 indexed citations
15.
Cuadrado, Daniel G., Alec Beekley, Kurt W. Grathwohl, et al.. (2006). The impact of hypothermia on trauma care at the 31st combat support hospital. The American Journal of Surgery. 191(5). 610–614. 80 indexed citations
16.
Rush, Robert M.. (2006). Preface. Surgical Clinics of North America. 86(3). xvii–xxi.
17.
Rush, Robert M., et al.. (2005). Supporting the Global War on Terror: a tale of two campaigns featuring the 250th Forward Surgical Team (Airborne). The American Journal of Surgery. 189(5). 564–570. 55 indexed citations
18.
Pratt, Jerry W. & Robert M. Rush. (2003). The military surgeon and the war on terrorism: a Zollinger legacy. The American Journal of Surgery. 186(3). 292–295. 17 indexed citations
19.
Schirmer, William J., W. Scott Melvin, Robert M. Rush, et al.. (1995). Indium-111-pentetreotide scanning versus conventional imaging techniques for the localization of gastrinoma. Surgery. 118(6). 1105–1114. 33 indexed citations
20.
Rush, Robert M., et al.. (1973). Injuries of the vagina.. PubMed. 47(29). 1325–6. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026