Tisha C. King‐Heiden

759 total citations
23 papers, 597 citations indexed

About

Tisha C. King‐Heiden is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Tisha C. King‐Heiden has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 597 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 8 papers in Pollution and 5 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Tisha C. King‐Heiden's work include Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (11 papers), Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (7 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers). Tisha C. King‐Heiden is often cited by papers focused on Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (11 papers), Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (7 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers). Tisha C. King‐Heiden collaborates with scholars based in United States. Tisha C. King‐Heiden's co-authors include Warren Heideman, Richard E. Peterson, Robert J. Hamers, Kevin M. Metz, Dorothy J. Nesbit, Andrew N. Mangham, Joel A. Pedersen, Kevin A. Lanham, Dagmara S. Antkiewicz and Vatsal Mehta and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Environmental Science & Technology and Journal of Immunological Methods.

In The Last Decade

Tisha C. King‐Heiden

23 papers receiving 591 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tisha C. King‐Heiden United States 12 282 171 131 119 52 23 597
Jianghuan Hua China 15 341 1.2× 147 0.9× 268 2.0× 136 1.1× 68 1.3× 25 738
Katerine S. Saili United States 11 452 1.6× 70 0.4× 165 1.3× 147 1.2× 77 1.5× 15 857
Yongfang Jia China 8 270 1.0× 66 0.4× 145 1.1× 124 1.0× 121 2.3× 16 699
April Feswick United States 16 194 0.7× 150 0.9× 88 0.7× 101 0.8× 13 0.3× 24 588
Jiejun Gao China 11 232 0.8× 264 1.5× 152 1.2× 124 1.0× 72 1.4× 14 707
Tisha C. King Heiden United States 7 117 0.4× 93 0.5× 52 0.4× 114 1.0× 44 0.8× 8 381
Rachel C. Skirrow Canada 14 348 1.2× 141 0.8× 326 2.5× 153 1.3× 12 0.2× 16 784
B. Lynn Escalon United States 13 323 1.1× 69 0.4× 190 1.5× 98 0.8× 36 0.7× 17 596
Dércia Santos Portugal 16 321 1.1× 230 1.3× 543 4.1× 89 0.7× 94 1.8× 25 919
Su‐Mei Wu China 16 159 0.6× 54 0.3× 42 0.3× 98 0.8× 16 0.3× 42 752

Countries citing papers authored by Tisha C. King‐Heiden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tisha C. King‐Heiden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tisha C. King‐Heiden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tisha C. King‐Heiden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tisha C. King‐Heiden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tisha C. King‐Heiden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tisha C. King‐Heiden. The network helps show where Tisha C. King‐Heiden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tisha C. King‐Heiden

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tisha C. King‐Heiden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tisha C. King‐Heiden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tisha C. King‐Heiden. Tisha C. King‐Heiden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
King‐Heiden, Tisha C., et al.. (2024). Adaptation of the in vivo respiratory burst assay for fathead minnow larvae (Pimephales promelas). Journal of Immunological Methods. 536. 113797–113797. 1 indexed citations
3.
King‐Heiden, Tisha C., et al.. (2023). Chronic Exposure to Environmentally Relevant Concentrations of Imidacloprid Impact Survival and Ecologically Relevant Behaviors of Fathead Minnow Larvae. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 42(10). 2184–2192. 5 indexed citations
4.
King‐Heiden, Tisha C., et al.. (2023). Binary mixtures of imidacloprid and thiamethoxam do not appear to cause additive toxicity in fathead minnow larvae (Pimephales promelas). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5. 1282817–1282817. 5 indexed citations
5.
Boogaard, Michael A., et al.. (2023). Seasonal differences in larval sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) sensitivity to the pesticide TFM. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 50(1). 102248–102248. 2 indexed citations
6.
King‐Heiden, Tisha C., et al.. (2022). Potency matters: Impacts of embryonic exposure to nAChR agonists thiamethoxam and nicotine on hatching success, growth, and neurobehavior in larval zebrafish. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. 85(18). 767–782. 15 indexed citations
7.
King‐Heiden, Tisha C., et al.. (2019). Larval exposure to environmentally relevant concentrations of triclosan impairs metamorphosis and reproductive fitness in zebrafish. Reproductive Toxicology. 87. 79–86. 29 indexed citations
8.
9.
Perez, Kathryn E. & Tisha C. King‐Heiden. (2018). Geometric Morphometrics as a Tool to Evaluate Teratogenic Effects in Zebrafish (Danio rerio). Methods in molecular biology. 1797. 373–391. 2 indexed citations
10.
King‐Heiden, Tisha C., et al.. (2018). Using case-study based modules to promote a better understanding of evolution in an undergraduate anatomy and physiology course. Journal of Biological Education. 53(5). 477–491. 1 indexed citations
11.
Perez, Kathryn E., et al.. (2018). Embryonic exposure to environmentally relevant concentrations of triclosan impairs foraging efficiency in zebrafish larvae. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 37(12). 3124–3133. 15 indexed citations
12.
Liu, Qing, et al.. (2016). Maternal methylmercury from a wild-caught walleye diet induces developmental abnormalities in zebrafish. Reproductive Toxicology. 65. 272–282. 9 indexed citations
13.
14.
Howard, David R., et al.. (2016). Cardiac Toxicity of Triclosan in Developing Zebrafish. Zebrafish. 13(5). 399–404. 36 indexed citations
15.
Howard, David R., et al.. (2015). Juvenile exposure to vinclozolin shifts sex ratios and impairs reproductive capacity of zebrafish. Reproductive Toxicology. 58. 111–118. 31 indexed citations
16.
Gerrish, Gretchen A., et al.. (2015). Building the Impetus for Change: An Across-Curriculum Initiative in Biology. Journal of College Science Teaching. 44(4). 28–35. 1 indexed citations
17.
Baker, Tracie R., Tisha C. King‐Heiden, Richard E. Peterson, & Warren Heideman. (2014). Dioxin induction of transgenerational inheritance of disease in zebrafish. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 398(1-2). 36–41. 49 indexed citations
18.
Hutz, Reinhold J., et al.. (2014). Familiar and novel reproductive endocrine disruptors: xenoestrogens, dioxins and nanoparticles.. PubMed. 7. 111–122. 13 indexed citations
19.
Perez, Kathryn E., et al.. (2013). Embryonic exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin impairs prey capture by zebrafish larvae. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 33(4). 784–790. 16 indexed citations
20.
King‐Heiden, Tisha C., Vatsal Mehta, Kevin A. Lanham, et al.. (2011). Reproductive and developmental toxicity of dioxin in fish. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 354(1-2). 121–138. 129 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jianghuan Hua Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Katerine S. Saili Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Yongfang Jia Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by April Feswick Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jiejun Gao Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tisha C. King Heiden Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rachel C. Skirrow Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by B. Lynn Escalon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dércia Santos Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Su‐Mei Wu
Rankless by CCL
2026