Robert M. Fowler
Impact in
- Religious studies top 2%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
- Development top 10%
- Development, Ethics, and Society
Papers in
-
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 5
- Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies 1
-
- Piezoelectric Actuators and Control 2
- Co-authors
- Daniel Patte (1 shared paper)Spencer P. Magleby (1 shared paper)Larry L. Howell (1 shared paper)Fernando F. Segovia (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Biblical Literature (4 papers)Mechanism and Machine Theory (1 paper)ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Robert M. Fowler
8 papers receiving 106 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Religious studies 63
- Development 12
- Control and Systems Engineering 38
- Philosophy 17
- Communication 9
Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Fowler
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Fowler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Fowler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Fowler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Fowler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Fowler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Fowler. The network helps show where Robert M. Fowler may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Robert M. Fowler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Let the Reader Understand: Reader-Response Criticism and the Gospel of Mark | 1991 | 41 |
| 2 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 19 | |
| 4 | 1985 | 12 | |
| 5 | Investigation of Compliant Space Mechanisms with Application to the Design of a Large-Displacement Monolithic Compliant Rotational Hinge | 2012 | 8 |
| 6 | 1984 | 7 | |
| 7 | New paradigms for Bible study : the Bible in the third millennium | 2004 | 5 |
| 8 | 1986 | 2 |
About Robert M. Fowler
Robert M. Fowler is a scholar working on Religious studies, Control and Systems Engineering, Sociology and Political Science, Civil and Structural Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 8 papers that have together received 129 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (5 papers), Piezoelectric Actuators and Control (2 papers), Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (1 paper), Engineering Technology and Methodologies (1 paper), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (1 paper), Historical and Linguistic Studies (1 paper), Religion, Society, and Development (1 paper) and Structural Analysis and Optimization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (63 citations), Development (12 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (38 citations), Philosophy (17 citations) and Communication (9 citations). Robert M. Fowler has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Patte, Spencer P. Magleby, Larry L. Howell and Fernando F. Segovia. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Mechanism and Machine Theory and ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.