Robert Jach

1.5k total citations
34 papers, 555 citations indexed

About

Robert Jach is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert Jach has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 555 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 9 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Robert Jach's work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (10 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (7 papers) and Gynecological conditions and treatments (7 papers). Robert Jach is often cited by papers focused on Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (10 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (7 papers) and Gynecological conditions and treatments (7 papers). Robert Jach collaborates with scholars based in Poland, Netherlands and France. Robert Jach's co-authors include Anne‐Sophie Bats, Denis Querleu, Grzegorz Dyduch, Ladislav Dušek, David Cibula, L Ševčík, René H.M. Verheijen, Michal Zikán, Afra Zaal and Gemma G. Kenter and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Human Reproduction and Fertility and Sterility.

In The Last Decade

Robert Jach

30 papers receiving 543 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert Jach Poland 12 395 232 186 125 101 34 555
Laura L. Holman United States 14 353 0.9× 135 0.6× 325 1.7× 156 1.2× 77 0.8× 60 635
Keng Shen China 13 409 1.0× 142 0.6× 301 1.6× 150 1.2× 73 0.7× 49 574
Astrid Baalbergen Netherlands 14 312 0.8× 240 1.0× 212 1.1× 113 0.9× 176 1.7× 24 601
M J E Mourits Netherlands 8 215 0.5× 174 0.8× 175 0.9× 143 1.1× 132 1.3× 10 551
Terry A. Harrison United States 13 372 0.9× 249 1.1× 290 1.6× 122 1.0× 226 2.2× 19 632
Chuenkamon Charakorn Thailand 11 161 0.4× 97 0.4× 130 0.7× 77 0.6× 115 1.1× 19 374
Hyo Sook Bae South Korea 12 247 0.6× 57 0.2× 195 1.0× 96 0.8× 78 0.8× 25 403
Robin A. Lacour United States 11 155 0.4× 89 0.4× 195 1.0× 182 1.5× 58 0.6× 21 579
Caroline C. Billingsley United States 9 173 0.4× 70 0.3× 118 0.6× 147 1.2× 58 0.6× 26 433
Kenneth Hatch United States 10 376 1.0× 201 0.9× 186 1.0× 102 0.8× 147 1.5× 14 550

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Jach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Jach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Jach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Jach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Jach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Jach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Jach. The network helps show where Robert Jach may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Jach

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Jach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Jach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Jach. Robert Jach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bednarczyk, M., et al.. (2024). Davydov-Moore vaginoplasty in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: sexual and surgical outcomes. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 312(1). 119–124.
3.
Baran, R, et al.. (2023). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug with a local anesthetic compared to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug alone significantly reduce the pain associated with vaginoscopic office hysteroscopy. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 288. 61–66. 1 indexed citations
4.
Łukaszuk, Krzysztof, Magdalena Błażek, Agnieszka Jagiełło-Gruszfeld, et al.. (2023). Fertility preservation during oncological treatment. Oncology in Clinical Practice. 20(2). 100–116. 1 indexed citations
6.
Jach, Robert, et al.. (2020). Patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome (MRKH) who Underwent Laparoscopic Davydov-Moore vaginoplasty. Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz). 6(1).
7.
Markowska, Anna, Robert Jach, Andrzej Marszałek, et al.. (2019). Significance of BRCA1 expression in breast and ovarian cancer patients with brain metastasis – A multicentre study. Advances in Medical Sciences. 64(2). 235–240. 7 indexed citations
8.
Knapp, Paweł, Paweł Blecharz, Lubomir Bodnar, et al.. (2019). Current management of cervical cancer in Poland—Analysis of the questionnaire trial for the years 2002-2014 in relation to ASCO 2016 recommendations. PLoS ONE. 14(1). e0209901–e0209901. 4 indexed citations
9.
Jach, Robert, et al.. (2019). The thin red line – postmenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding with endometrial thickness less than 4 mm. Współczesna Onkologia. 23(1). 43–46. 5 indexed citations
10.
Huras, Hubert, et al.. (2018). [The level of implementation of the prevention program of group B Streptococcal infection during pregnancy and in newborns in accordance to the recommendations of the Polish Gynaecological Society - questionnaire survey].. PubMed. 73(9). 632–6.
11.
Kluz, Tomasz, Elżbieta Marczyk, Robert Jach, et al.. (2018). Frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 causative founder variants in ovarian cancer patients in South-East Poland. Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice. 16(1). 6–6. 14 indexed citations
12.
Jach, Robert, et al.. (2018). [Analysis of histological type and staging of cervical cancer as prognostic factors among women treated in the Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University in the years 2001-2014].. PubMed. 74(1). 13–20. 2 indexed citations
13.
14.
Jach, Robert, et al.. (2016). Autotelic vs instrumental motivation of doctors and their medical specialty choice in relation to sense of coherence.. Psychiatria Polska. 50(2). 445–455. 3 indexed citations
15.
Basta, Antoni, Mariusz Bidziński, Andrzej Bieńkiewicz, et al.. (2015). Rekomendacje Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologii Onkologicznej dotyczące diagnostyki i leczenia raka jajnika Wersja 2015.1. Via Medica Journals. 1(2). 83–93. 1 indexed citations
16.
Zaal, Afra, Ronald P. Zweemer, Michal Zikán, et al.. (2014). Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Improves Survival in Patients With Cervical Cancer With Low-Volume Disease in the Sentinel Node. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 24(2). 303–311. 34 indexed citations
17.
18.
Ludwin, Artur, I. Ludwin, Kazimierz Pityński, et al.. (2013). Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Hysteroscopic Myomectomy of Submucosal Myomas With a Varying Degree of Myometrial Penetration. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 20(5). 672–685. 29 indexed citations
19.
Cibula, David, Nadeem R. Abu‐Rustum, Ladislav Dušek, et al.. (2012). Bilateral ultrastaging of sentinel lymph node in cervical cancer: Lowering the false-negative rate and improving the detection of micrometastasis. Gynecologic Oncology. 127(3). 462–466. 101 indexed citations
20.
Cibula, David, Nadeem R. Abu‐Rustum, Ladislav Dušek, et al.. (2011). Prognostic significance of low volume sentinel lymph node disease in early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 124(3). 496–501. 148 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026