Robert J. Pruett

409 total citations
10 papers, 337 citations indexed

About

Robert J. Pruett is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Artificial Intelligence and Geochemistry and Petrology. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert J. Pruett has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 337 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Biomaterials, 3 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 2 papers in Geochemistry and Petrology. Recurrent topics in Robert J. Pruett's work include Clay minerals and soil interactions (7 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (3 papers) and Iron oxide chemistry and applications (2 papers). Robert J. Pruett is often cited by papers focused on Clay minerals and soil interactions (7 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (3 papers) and Iron oxide chemistry and applications (2 papers). Robert J. Pruett collaborates with scholars based in United States. Robert J. Pruett's co-authors include Paul A. Schroeder, Nathan D. Melear, Vernon J. Hurst and Haydn H. Murray and has published in prestigious journals such as American Mineralogist, Applied Clay Science and Clays and Clay Minerals.

In The Last Decade

Robert J. Pruett

10 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Robert J. Pruett United States	8	167	73	70	54	51	10	337
Ira Edgar Odom United States	7	182 1.1×	99 1.4×	88 1.3×	69 1.3×	106 2.1×	10	484
Wayne M. Bundy United States	6	230 1.4×	79 1.1×	54 0.8×	62 1.1×	83 1.6×	14	395
Heinrich M. Köster Germany	13	249 1.5×	116 1.6×	58 0.8×	123 2.3×	105 2.1×	18	431
R. T. Martin United States	8	238 1.4×	118 1.6×	29 0.4×	84 1.6×	64 1.3×	9	522
Harry C. Starkey United States	7	172 1.0×	96 1.3×	69 1.0×	48 0.9×	79 1.5×	12	356
Lise Griffault France	10	156 0.9×	174 2.4×	58 0.8×	52 1.0×	72 1.4×	18	494
Keinosuke Nagasawa Japan	9	125 0.7×	49 0.7×	74 1.1×	33 0.6×	121 2.4×	32	305
Artur Kuligiewicz Poland	10	188 1.1×	130 1.8×	46 0.7×	81 1.5×	35 0.7×	24	378
Ryuji Kitagawa Japan	10	252 1.5×	110 1.5×	84 1.2×	85 1.6×	229 4.5×	57	460
Hideomi Kodama Canada	11	185 1.1×	62 0.8×	57 0.8×	72 1.3×	85 1.7×	19	355

Countries citing papers authored by Robert J. Pruett

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert J. Pruett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert J. Pruett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert J. Pruett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert J. Pruett

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert J. Pruett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert J. Pruett. The network helps show where Robert J. Pruett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert J. Pruett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert J. Pruett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert J. Pruett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert J. Pruett. Robert J. Pruett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Pruett, Robert J.. (2016). Kaolin deposits and their uses: Northern Brazil and Georgia, USA. Applied Clay Science. 131. 3–13. 42 indexed citations

2.

Pruett, Robert J.. (2012). Advances in selective flocculation processes for the beneficiation of kaolin. Mining Metallurgy & Exploration. 29(1). 27–35. 3 indexed citations

3.

Pruett, Robert J.. (2010). The carbon footprint and lifecycle analysis of kaolin and calcium carbonate pigments in paper. Mining Metallurgy & Exploration. 27(1). 17–23. 1 indexed citations

4.

Schroeder, Paul A., Robert J. Pruett, & Nathan D. Melear. (2004). Crystal-Chemical Changes in an Oxidative Weathering Front in a Georgia Kaolin Deposit. Clays and Clay Minerals. 52(2). 211–220. 39 indexed citations

5.

Schroeder, Paul A., Nathan D. Melear, & Robert J. Pruett. (2003). Quantitative analysis of anatase in Georgia kaolins using Raman spectroscopy. Applied Clay Science. 23(5-6). 299–308. 29 indexed citations

6.

Schroeder, Paul A., Robert J. Pruett, & Vernon J. Hurst. (1998). Effects of Secondary Iron Phases on Kaolinite ²⁷Al MAS NMR Spectra. Clays and Clay Minerals. 46(4). 429–435. 18 indexed citations

7.

Pruett, Robert J., et al.. (1998). Zeta potential and related properties of kaolin clays from Georgia. Mining Metallurgy & Exploration. 15(1). 50–52. 12 indexed citations

8.

Schroeder, Paul A. & Robert J. Pruett. (1996). Fe ordering in kaolinite; insights from²⁹Si and²⁷Al MAS NMR spectroscopy. American Mineralogist. 81(1-2). 26–38. 50 indexed citations

9.

Pruett, Robert J., et al.. (1993). Sampling and Analysis of KGa-1B Well-Crystallized Kaolin Source Clay. Clays and Clay Minerals. 41(4). 514–519. 131 indexed citations

10.

Pruett, Robert J. & Haydn H. Murray. (1991). Clay Mineralogy, Alteration History, and Economic Geology of the Whitemud Formation, Southern Saskatchewan, Canada. Clays and Clay Minerals. 39(6). 586–596. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact