Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings.
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Hopper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Hopper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Hopper more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Hopper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Hopper. The network helps show where Robert Hopper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Hopper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Hopper.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Hopper based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Hopper. Robert Hopper is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hopper, Robert. (2003). Gender Talk. Michigan State University Press eBooks.7 indexed citations
Hopper, Robert, et al.. (1978). Teaching Functional Communication Skills in the Elementary Classroom.. Communication Education. 27(4).4 indexed citations
Taylor, L. A., K. C. Misra, D. R. Uhlmann, & Robert Hopper. (1975). Absolute cooling rates of lunar rocks - Theory and application. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings. 1. 181–191.19 indexed citations
13.
Klein, Lisa C., P. I. K. Onorato, D. R. Uhlmann, & Robert Hopper. (1975). Viscous flow, crystallization behavior, and thermal histories of lunar breccias 70019 and 79155. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings. 1. 579–593.3 indexed citations
14.
Uhlmann, D. R., Lisa C. Klein, P. I. K. Onorato, & Robert Hopper. (1975). The formation of lunar breccias - Sintering and crystallization kinetics. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings. 1. 693–705.7 indexed citations
15.
Hopper, Robert, P. I. K. Onorato, & D. R. Uhlmann. (1974). Thermal histories and crystal distributions in partly devitrified lunar glasses cooled by radiation.. Lunar Science Conference. 3. 2257–22731974.6 indexed citations
16.
Uhlmann, D. R., Lisa C. Klein, Gene Kritchevsky, & Robert Hopper. (1974). The formation of lunar glasses. Lunar Science Conference. 3. 2317–2331.19 indexed citations
17.
Hopper, Robert & D. R. Uhlmann. (1973). EFFECTS OF ELECTRIC FIELDS ON SPINODAL DECOMPOSITION.. Physics and chemistry of glasses. 14(2). 37–44.12 indexed citations
18.
Scherer, George W., et al.. (1973). Viscous flow and crystallization behavior of selected lunar compositions. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings. 4. 2685.12 indexed citations
19.
Scherer, George W., Robert Hopper, & D. R. Uhlmann. (1972). Crystallization behavior and glass formation of selected lunar compositions.. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings. 3. 2627.3 indexed citations
20.
Hopper, Robert. (1971). Functional Aspects of Speech Development..1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.