Robert Harwood

535 total citations
9 papers, 354 citations indexed

About

Robert Harwood is a scholar working on Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert Harwood has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 354 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Surgery, 4 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and 3 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Robert Harwood's work include Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (3 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers). Robert Harwood is often cited by papers focused on Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (3 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers). Robert Harwood collaborates with scholars based in United States. Robert Harwood's co-authors include Michael J. Lambert, Michael Blaivas, Joseph P. Wood, Daniel V. Girzadas, K. Rzechula, Ira Shulman, Jay Zhu, Elizabeth Beale, Linda S. Chan and Δημήτριος Δημητριάδης and has published in prestigious journals such as Injury, Medical Teacher and Academic Emergency Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Robert Harwood

9 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Robert Harwood United States	6	226	111	110	98	64	9	354
Joshua S. Rempell United States	9	274 1.2×	67 0.6×	91 0.8×	194 2.0×	22 0.3×	29	356
Rasmus Aagaard Denmark	10	118 0.5×	115 1.0×	76 0.7×	50 0.5×	25 0.4×	26	228
Tycho J. Olgers Netherlands	10	142 0.6×	80 0.7×	86 0.8×	72 0.7×	31 0.5×	26	306
Ricardo Franco‐Sadud United States	7	271 1.2×	53 0.5×	192 1.7×	130 1.3×	11 0.2×	9	432
Carolina Candotti United States	5	165 0.7×	21 0.2×	125 1.1×	72 0.7×	23 0.4×	5	284
Joel Cho United States	5	237 1.0×	48 0.4×	145 1.3×	110 1.1×	8 0.1×	5	355
Christian Hohenstein Germany	8	73 0.3×	92 0.8×	41 0.4×	41 0.4×	17 0.3×	34	272
Michael G. Allison United States	9	133 0.6×	142 1.3×	94 0.9×	16 0.2×	14 0.2×	15	311
H. Ilper Germany	8	350 1.5×	265 2.4×	245 2.2×	87 0.9×	15 0.2×	17	498
Lynette J. Mark United States	12	42 0.2×	111 1.0×	161 1.5×	23 0.2×	76 1.2×	15	462

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Harwood

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Harwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Harwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Harwood more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Harwood

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Harwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Harwood. The network helps show where Robert Harwood may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Harwood

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Harwood. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Harwood based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Harwood. Robert Harwood is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Harwood, Robert, et al.. (2013). An attending physician float shift for the improvement of physician productivity in a crowded emergency department. World Journal of Emergency Medicine. 4(1). 10–10. 5 indexed citations

2.

Harwood, Robert, et al.. (2011). An Inexpensive, Easily Constructed, Reusable Task Trainer for Simulating Ultrasound-Guided Pericardiocentesis. Journal of Emergency Medicine. 43(6). 1066–1069. 26 indexed citations

3.

Girzadas, Daniel V., et al.. (2009). Hybrid Simulation Combining a High Fidelity Scenario with a Pelvic Ultrasound Task Trainer Enhances the Training and Evaluation of Endovaginal Ultrasound Skills. Academic Emergency Medicine. 16(5). 429–435. 41 indexed citations

4.

Girzadas, Daniel V., et al.. (2009). An Inexpensive, Easily Constructed, Reusable Task Trainer for Simulating Ultrasound‐Guided Pericardiocentesis. Academic Emergency Medicine. 16(s1). 2 indexed citations

5.

Girzadas, Daniel V., et al.. (2007). High fidelity simulation can discriminate between novice and experienced residents when assessing competency in patient care. Medical Teacher. 29(5). 472–476. 37 indexed citations

6.

Beale, Elizabeth, Jay Zhu, Linda S. Chan, et al.. (2006). Blood transfusion in critically injured patients: A prospective study. Injury. 37(5). 455–465. 35 indexed citations

7.

Blaivas, Michael, et al.. (2000). Lower‐extremity Doppler for Deep Venous Thrombosis—Can Emergency Physicians Be Accurate and Fast?. Academic Emergency Medicine. 7(2). 120–126. 114 indexed citations

8.

Blaivas, Michael, Robert Harwood, & Michael J. Lambert. (1999). Decreasing Length of Stay with Emergency Ultrasound Examination of the Gallbladder. Academic Emergency Medicine. 6(10). 1020–1023. 92 indexed citations

9.

Harwood, Robert. (1996). Respiratory Care of the Newborn. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact