Robert G. Eppinger

40 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers

Robert G. Eppinger
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 114
  • Geophysics 182
  • Artificial Intelligence 214
  • Environmental Chemistry 52
  • Pollution 53
Replace Kierran C. Maher with:
Kierran C. Maher United States
Arthur A. Bookstrom United States
L. Graham Closs United States
Nathan Reid Australia
Adrienne C. L. Larocque Canada
Richard F. Sanford United States
Miguel Gaspar Portugal
Ahmed El-Kammar Egypt
W B Coker Canada
Ian Nichol Canada
Robert G. Eppinger relative to Kierran C. Maher United States Kierran C. Maher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Kierran C. Maher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert G. Eppinger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert G. Eppinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert G. Eppinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert G. Eppinger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert G. Eppinger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert G. Eppinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert G. Eppinger. The network helps show where Robert G. Eppinger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert G. Eppinger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert G. Eppinger Line = papers co-authored together Robert G. Eppinger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201148
2 199043
3 201323
4 201221
5 199220
6 200718
7 201316
8 200612
9 201212
10 201011
11 201311
12 201010
13 201310
14 19919
15 20009
16 20089
17 20038
18 20077
19 20117
20
TOOLS FOR THE RAPID SCREENING AND CHARACTERIZATION OF HISTORICAL METAL-MINING WASTE DUMPS
20005

About Robert G. Eppinger

Robert G. Eppinger is a scholar working on Geochemistry and Petrology, Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 43 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (30 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (14 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (11 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (7 papers), Mine drainage and remediation techniques (6 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (4 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (4 papers) and Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geochemistry and Petrology (114 citations), Geophysics (182 citations), Artificial Intelligence (214 citations), Environmental Chemistry (52 citations) and Pollution (53 citations). Robert G. Eppinger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karen D. Kelley, L. Graham Closs, Steven M. Smith, D.L. Fey, John Gray, Paul H. Briggs, James R. Lang, L.P. Gough, Cynthia Dusel-Bacon and Bernard E. Hubbard. Their work appears in journals such as Economic Geology, Geochemistry Exploration Environment Analysis, Applied Geochemistry, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta and Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026