Robert F. Pitts
- Nephrology top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Physiology top 5%
- Clinical Biochemistry top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Jay JacobyRoy C. SwanMartha B. MacLeodRichard H. KesslerDavid D. ThompsonW. James SullivanWilliam A. WebberRuth S. Gurd
- Topics
- Renal function and acid-base balance (27 papers)Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (14 papers)Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (14 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesMalaysia
In The Last Decade
Robert F. Pitts
71 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
- Nephrology 972
- Molecular Biology 828
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 640
- Physiology 572
- Clinical Biochemistry 449
Countries citing papers authored by Robert F. Pitts
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert F. Pitts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert F. Pitts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert F. Pitts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert F. Pitts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert F. Pitts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert F. Pitts. The network helps show where Robert F. Pitts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert F. Pitts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert F. Pitts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert F. Pitts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert F. Pitts. Robert F. Pitts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 40 | |
| 4 | 37 | |
| 5 | 60 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 51 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 47 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 49 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 50 | |
| 15 | 47 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About Robert F. Pitts
Robert F. Pitts is a scholar working on Nephrology, Clinical Biochemistry and Biochemistry, having authored 71 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal function and acid-base balance (27 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (14 papers) and Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (972 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (449 citations) and Biochemistry (272 citations). Robert F. Pitts has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Jay Jacoby, Roy C. Swan, Martha B. MacLeod, Richard H. Kessler, David D. Thompson, W. James Sullivan, William A. Webber, Ruth S. Gurd, K. Hierholzer and William J. Stone. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.