This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Eisner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Eisner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Eisner more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Eisner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Eisner. The network helps show where Robert Eisner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Eisner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Eisner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Eisner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Eisner. Robert Eisner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Eisner, Robert. (2016). Fiscal and Monetary Policy Reconsidered: Reply. American Economic Review. 61(3). 458–461.
2.
Eisner, Robert, et al.. (2016). A New View of the Federal Debt and Budget Deficits: Reply. American Economic Review. 76(5). 1156–1157.
3.
Eisner, Robert. (2003). The NAIRU and Fiscal and Monetary Policy for Now and Our Future: Some Comments. Chapters.1 indexed citations
4.
Eisner, Robert. (1997). Education in a System of National Accounts.. International Journal of Educational Research. 27(6).1 indexed citations
Eisner, Robert. (1992). Deficits: Which, How Much, and So What?. American Economic Review. 82(2). 295–298.22 indexed citations
9.
Eisner, Robert. (1991). Infrastructure and regional economic performance: comment. New England economic review. 47–58.88 indexed citations
10.
Eisner, Robert. (1990). Extended Accounts for National Income and Product: Reply. Journal of Economic Literature. 28(3). 1179–1183.4 indexed citations
11.
Eisner, Robert, et al.. (1986). Dette et déficit gouvernementaux : mesure et effets. Annals of Economics and Statistics. 27–52.2 indexed citations
12.
Desvousges, William H. & Robert Eisner. (1980). Factors in Business Investment. Southern Economic Journal. 46(4). 1257–1257.1 indexed citations
13.
Eisner, Robert. (1977). Capital Shortage: Myth and Reality. American Economic Review. 67(1). 110–115.5 indexed citations
14.
Eisner, Robert, et al.. (1975). Tax Policy and Investment: An Analysis of Survey Responses. American Economic Review. 65(1). 206–212.6 indexed citations
15.
Eisner, Robert. (1974). Issues in Econometric Studies of Investment Behavior: Comment. Journal of Economic Literature. 12(1). 49–50.1 indexed citations
16.
Eisner, Robert. (1974). Endowment Income, Capital Gains and Inflation Accounting: Discussion. American Economic Review. 64(2). 438–441.2 indexed citations
17.
Eisner, Robert. (1970). Tax Policy and Investment Behavior: Further Comment. American Economic Review. 60(4). 746–752.12 indexed citations
Eisner, Robert. (1969). Tax Policy and Investment Behavior: Comment. American Economic Review. 59(3). 379–388.25 indexed citations
20.
Eisner, Robert. (1964). Capital Expenditures, Profits, and the Acceleration Principle. NBER Chapters. 137–176.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.