Robert E. Mogar
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Applied Psychology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies 7
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 2
-
- Human Behavior and Motivation 2
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 2
- Co-authors
- William D. Loughman (1 shared paper)James Fadiman (2 shared papers)Willis W. Harman (1 shared paper)Charles Savage (2 shared papers)Mary Allen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Humanistic Psychology (3 papers)Psychotherapy (1 paper)Science (1 paper)Journal of Counseling Psychology (1 paper)Psychological Reports (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Robert E. Mogar
16 papers receiving 382 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Clinical Psychology 274
- Applied Psychology 59
- General Psychology 10
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 59
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 81
Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Mogar
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Mogar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Mogar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Mogar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Mogar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Mogar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Mogar. The network helps show where Robert E. Mogar may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Mogar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1971 | 99 | |
| 2 | 1966 | 92 | |
| 3 | 1967 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1969 | 41 | |
| 5 | 1970 | 36 | |
| 6 | 1960 | 26 | |
| 7 | The effects of psychedelic (LSD) therapy on values, personality, and behavior. | 1966 | 26 |
| 8 | 1967 | 25 | |
| 9 | 1964 | 20 | |
| 10 | 1962 | 20 | |
| 11 | 1965 | 19 | |
| 12 | The use of psychedelic agents with autistic schizophrenic children. | 1969 | 18 |
| 13 | 1969 | 17 | |
| 14 | 1964 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1970 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1962 | 3 |
About Robert E. Mogar
Robert E. Mogar is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Organic Chemistry and Social Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 504 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (7 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers), Human Behavior and Motivation (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (274 citations), Applied Psychology (59 citations), General Psychology (10 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (59 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (81 citations). Robert E. Mogar has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William D. Loughman, James Fadiman, Willis W. Harman, Charles Savage and Mary Allen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Psychotherapy, Science, Journal of Counseling Psychology and Psychological Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.