Robert E. Fields

25 papers receiving 570 citations

Peers

Robert E. Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Human-Computer Interaction 45
  • Analytical Chemistry 20
  • Materials Chemistry 63
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 1
  • Health Information Management 9
Replace Etienne Losson with:
Etienne Losson France
Yu‐Chun Huang Taiwan
Ugo Biader Ceipidor Italy
Björn Kruse Sweden
Seung Ah Lee South Korea
Luigi Bibbò Italy
Soumia Ziti Morocco
Willem Fontijn Netherlands
Keita Watanabe Japan
Eddie Yan United States
Robert E. Fields relative to Etienne Losson France Etienne Losson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Etienne Losson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Fields. The network helps show where Robert E. Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert E. Fields Line = papers co-authored together Robert E. Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000183
2 2002123
3 200693
4 199744
5 200635
6 200232
7 199917
8 201315
9 19989
10 20019
11
An investigation into the application of Claims Analysis to evaluate usability of a digital library interface
20029
12 20218
13 20007
14 20016
15 20025
16 19874
17 19873
18 19963
19 20213
20 19942

About Robert E. Fields

Robert E. Fields is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Spectroscopy, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Analytical Chemistry and Materials Chemistry, having authored 26 papers that have together received 617 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Usability and User Interface Design (3 papers), Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (2 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Fuel Cells and Related Materials (1 paper), Data Visualization and Analytics (1 paper), Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis (1 paper), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (1 paper) and Logic, programming, and type systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (45 citations), Analytical Chemistry (20 citations), Materials Chemistry (63 citations), Life-span and Life-course Studies (1 citation) and Health Information Management (9 citations). Robert E. Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Michael D. Harrison, Peter R. Wright, Piotr Zelenay, Piotr Piela, James M. Harnly, Vahid Majidi, John P. Selegue, Robert C. Haddon, Hui Hu and Mark A. Hamon. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Spectroscopy, Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy, Physics of Plasmas, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction and International Journal of Mass Spectrometry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact