Robert E. Davis

71 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Robert E. Davis
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Applied Psychology 105
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 328
  • Clinical Psychology 351
  • Gastroenterology 88
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 202
Replace Yoneatsu Osaki with:
Yoneatsu Osaki Japan
Lauren C. Heathcote United States
L. Olsen Sweden
Daphne Kounali United Kingdom
Felix Fischer Germany
Frank M. Ahern United States
Shih‐Cheng Liao Taiwan
Harry G.M. Rooijmans Netherlands
Herbert Fliege Germany
James A. Bourgeois United States
Robert E. Davis relative to Yoneatsu Osaki Japan Yoneatsu Osaki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Yoneatsu Osaki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Davis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Davis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Davis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Davis. The network helps show where Robert E. Davis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Davis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert E. Davis Line = papers co-authored together Robert E. Davis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003140
2 2002109
3 1988104
4 199087
5 200881
6 200474
7 200871
8 200471
9 197964
10 202160
11 200951
12 202150
13 197943
14 201936
15 201935
16 202135
17 199835
18 201732
19 198032
20 201931

About Robert E. Davis

Robert E. Davis is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (6 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (5 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (5 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (4 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (105 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (328 citations), Clinical Psychology (351 citations), Gastroenterology (88 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (202 citations). Robert E. Davis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David Y. Graham, Manoj Sharma, Ulrich Ettinger, Philip J. Corr, M F Rack, Frank L. Lanza, Vinayak K. Nahar, Jane Powell, Lynne Dawkins and Tonmoy Sharma. Their work appears in journals such as Health Promotion Perspectives, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Digestive Diseases and Sciences, Archives of Dermatological Research and The Journal of Sex Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact