Robert Dale Parker
- Anthropology top 2%
- Archeology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Co-authors
- John HeringtonJohn EricksonB. McH.Helen VendlerElizabeth BishopPlutarchGeorge CawkwellFlorian Steger
- Topics
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism (7 papers)American and British Literature Analysis (4 papers)French Literature and Poetry (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
Robert Dale Parker
21 papers receiving 217 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Anthropology 189
- Archeology 136
- Sociology and Political Science 88
- Literature and Literary Theory 67
- Philosophy 65
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Dale Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Dale Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Dale Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Dale Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Dale Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Dale Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Dale Parker. The network helps show where Robert Dale Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Dale Parker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Dale Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Dale Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Dale Parker. Robert Dale Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | How to Interpret Literature: Critical Theory for Literary and Cultural Studies | 6 |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Critical Theory: A Reader for Literary and Cultural Studies | 10 |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | How to interpret literature | 0 |
| 8 | The Sound the Stars Make Rushing Through the Sky: The Writings of Jane Johnston Schoolcraft | 10 |
| 9 | Red Slippers and Cottonmouth Moccasins: White Anxieties in Faulkner's Indian Stories | 2 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Miasma: Pollution and Purification in Early Greek Religionbreakdown → | 291 |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Robert Dale Parker
Robert Dale Parker is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics and Music, having authored 29 papers that have together received 405 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Poetry Analysis and Criticism (7 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (4 papers) and French Literature and Poetry (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (189 citations), Archeology (136 citations) and Religious studies (48 citations). Frequent co-authors include John Herington, John Erickson, B. McH., Helen Vendler, Elizabeth Bishop, Plutarch, George Cawkwell, Florian Steger, John Dillon and Cristina Stanciu. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, Poetics Today and American Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.