Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within
it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Claiborne
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Claiborne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Claiborne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Claiborne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Claiborne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Claiborne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Claiborne. The network helps show where Robert Claiborne may publish in the future.
Robert Claiborne is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 13 papers that have together received 392 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lexicography and Language Studies (3 papers), Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity (2 papers) and Linguistics and language evolution (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (70 citations), Business and International Management (9 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (39 citations). Their work appears in journals such as Science, Hospital Practice and Bloomsbury eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.