Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
HANDBOOK OF CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 49th ed
1969573 citationsRobert C. WeastThe American Journal of the Medical Sciencesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert C. Weast
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert C. Weast's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert C. Weast with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert C. Weast more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert C. Weast. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert C. Weast. The network helps show where Robert C. Weast may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert C. Weast
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert C. Weast.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert C. Weast based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert C. Weast. Robert C. Weast is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Weast, Robert C.. (1986). CRC handbook of chemistry and physics. Sixty-seventh edition.2 indexed citations
2.
Weast, Robert C. & Jeanette G. Grasselli. (1985). CRC Handbook of Data on Organic Compounds. Medical Entomology and Zoology.183 indexed citations
3.
Weast, Robert C.. (1972). Handbook of chemistry and physics : a readyreference book of chemical and physical data. Medical Entomology and Zoology.23 indexed citations
4.
Weast, Robert C.. (1969). HANDBOOK OF CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 49th ed. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 257(6). 423–423.573 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Weast, Robert C., et al.. (1967). Handbook of tables for mathematics. CRC Press eBooks.56 indexed citations
6.
Weast, Robert C., et al.. (1967). CRC Handbook of tables for Mathematics. Medical Entomology and Zoology.21 indexed citations
7.
Weast, Robert C., et al.. (1965). Handbook of Mathematical Tables. Mathematics of Computation. 19(92). 680–680.55 indexed citations
8.
Weast, Robert C., et al.. (1965). CRC Handbook of chemistry and physics. A ready-reference book of chemical and physical data. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).284 indexed citations
9.
Weast, Robert C., et al.. (1965). CRC handbook of chemistry and physics : a ready-reference book of chemical and physical data-99th edition 2018-2019 99th ed. : 2018-2019.2 indexed citations
10.
Weast, Robert C., et al.. (1963). Handbook of Mathematical Tables. Mathematics of Computation. 17(83). 303–303.122 indexed citations
11.
Hodgman, Charles D., et al.. (1960). Tables for identification of organic compounds : supplement to Handbook of chemistry and physics. Medical Entomology and Zoology.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.