Robert C. de Loë

440 total citations
10 papers, 311 citations indexed

About

Robert C. de Loë is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Ocean Engineering and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert C. de Loë has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 311 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 4 papers in Ocean Engineering and 4 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in Robert C. de Loë's work include Water resources management and optimization (4 papers), Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (3 papers) and Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies (3 papers). Robert C. de Loë is often cited by papers focused on Water resources management and optimization (4 papers), Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (3 papers) and Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies (3 papers). Robert C. de Loë collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Sweden and Australia. Robert C. de Loë's co-authors include Suzanne von der Porten, Roger D. Needham, H.C. Simpson, Daniel P. Murray, Henning Bjørnlund, Sarah Michaels and Ryan Plummer and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Management, Geoforum and Applied Geography.

In The Last Decade

Robert C. de Loë

10 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Robert C. de Loë Canada	6	140	51	48	46	36	10	311
Kate J. Darby United States	6	106 0.8×	109 2.1×	39 0.8×	29 0.6×	31 0.9×	8	414
Kelsey Leonard Canada	8	116 0.8×	59 1.2×	32 0.7×	46 1.0×	41 1.1×	19	274
Kenichi Matsui Japan	10	103 0.7×	56 1.1×	31 0.6×	33 0.7×	42 1.2×	62	318
Victoria Morckel United States	12	125 0.9×	70 1.4×	27 0.6×	33 0.7×	17 0.5×	25	362
Seanna Davidson Australia	9	73 0.5×	72 1.4×	95 2.0×	37 0.8×	73 2.0×	12	326
Bjørn Ivar Kruke Norway	12	302 2.2×	69 1.4×	45 0.9×	11 0.2×	35 1.0×	26	509
Mary F. Evans United States	15	54 0.4×	35 0.7×	95 2.0×	44 1.0×	11 0.3×	37	745
Josef Leitmann United States	12	97 0.7×	49 1.0×	18 0.4×	34 0.7×	42 1.2×	32	367
Ken J. Caine Canada	9	135 1.0×	42 0.8×	72 1.5×	52 1.1×	17 0.5×	12	284
Miriam Grant Canada	11	161 1.1×	64 1.3×	60 1.3×	48 1.0×	29 0.8×	33	410

Countries citing papers authored by Robert C. de Loë

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert C. de Loë's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert C. de Loë with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert C. de Loë more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert C. de Loë

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert C. de Loë. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert C. de Loë. The network helps show where Robert C. de Loë may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert C. de Loë

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert C. de Loë. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert C. de Loë based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert C. de Loë. Robert C. de Loë is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Loë, Robert C. de, et al.. (2020). Thinking outside the “water box” in the Detroit River Area of Concern. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 46(6). 1726–1739. 3 indexed citations

Loë, Robert C. de, Daniel P. Murray, Sarah Michaels, & Ryan Plummer. (2016). Policy Transfer Among Regional-Level Organizations: Insights from Source Water Protection in Ontario. Environmental Management. 58(1). 31–47. 9 indexed citations

Porten, Suzanne von der & Robert C. de Loë. (2014). How Collaborative Approaches to Environmental Problem Solving View Indigenous Peoples: A Systematic Review. Society & Natural Resources. 27(10). 1040–1056. 26 indexed citations

Simpson, H.C. & Robert C. de Loë. (2014). A collaborative approach to groundwater protection: The Rural Water Quality Program for Waterloo Region. Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques. 39(2). 228–239. 17 indexed citations

Porten, Suzanne von der & Robert C. de Loë. (2013). Collaborative approaches to governance for water and Indigenous peoples: A case study from British Columbia, Canada. Geoforum. 50. 149–160. 57 indexed citations

Loë, Robert C. de, et al.. (2010). Analyzing Water Institutions in the 21st Century: Guidelines for Water Researchers and Professionals. 2(3). 229–244. 5 indexed citations

Loë, Robert C. de & Henning Bjørnlund. (2008). Irrigation and water security: the role of economic instruments and governance. WIT transactions on ecology and the environment. I. 35–42. 4 indexed citations

Loë, Robert C. de. (1995). Exploring complex policy questions using the policy Delphi. Applied Geography. 15(1). 53–68. 112 indexed citations

Loë, Robert C. de. (1991). THE INSTITUTIONAL PATTERN FOR WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN ONTARIO. Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques. 16(1). 23–43. 5 indexed citations

10.

Needham, Roger D. & Robert C. de Loë. (1990). THE POLICY DELPHI: PURPOSE, STRUCTURE, AND APPLICATION. Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes. 34(2). 133–142. 73 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact