Robert Bruce Moffett
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Pharmacology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Thomas E. WebbJohn WhiteKenneth W. GrossRichard V. HeinzelmanF. Merlin BumpusRoss McGowanAhsan HusainD. I. Weisblat
- Topics
- Structural and Chemical Analysis of Organic and Inorganic Compounds (8 papers)Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (5 papers)Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Robert Bruce Moffett
54 papers receiving 642 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Organic Chemistry 342
- Molecular Biology 287
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 80
- Pharmacology 66
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 48
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Bruce Moffett
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Bruce Moffett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Bruce Moffett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Bruce Moffett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Bruce Moffett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Bruce Moffett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Bruce Moffett. The network helps show where Robert Bruce Moffett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Bruce Moffett
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Bruce Moffett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Bruce Moffett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Bruce Moffett. Robert Bruce Moffett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 2 | 41 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 79 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 58 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Robert Bruce Moffett
Robert Bruce Moffett is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 56 papers that have together received 705 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Structural and Chemical Analysis of Organic and Inorganic Compounds (8 papers), Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (5 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (342 citations), Toxicology (16 citations) and Molecular Biology (287 citations). Robert Bruce Moffett has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas E. Webb, John White, Kenneth W. Gross, Richard V. Heinzelman, F. Merlin Bumpus, Ross McGowan, Ahsan Husain, D. I. Weisblat, Andrew H. Tang and Bharat V. Kamdar. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Biochemistry and Hypertension.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.