Robert Bacon
About
In The Last Decade
Robert Bacon
6 papers receiving 158 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 69
- Environmental Chemistry 51
- Automotive Engineering 38
- Economics and Econometrics 30
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 26
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Bacon
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Bacon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Bacon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Bacon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Bacon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Bacon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Bacon. The network helps show where Robert Bacon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Bacon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Bacon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Bacon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Bacon. Robert Bacon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | 69 | |
| 4 | OASIS at the WHT | 0 |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | 24 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.