Rita Mendes

15 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

Targeting Tumor Microenvironment for Cancer Therapy 2019 · 891 citations
8910+2+4Years since publication250500750

Peers

Rita Mendes
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Cancer Research 301
  • Biomaterials 229
  • Oncology 415
  • Immunology 268
  • Biomedical Engineering 414
Replace Pavan P. Adiseshaiah with:
Pavan P. Adiseshaiah United States
Yu Yao China
Shigeyuki Ozawa Japan
Meng Jia China
Guangyu Yao China
Marta Truffi Italy
Marina Pöttler Germany
Shanshan Wang China
Jooho Park South Korea
Rita Mendes relative to Pavan P. Adiseshaiah United States Pavan P. Adiseshaiah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Pavan P. Adiseshaiah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rita Mendes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rita Mendes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rita Mendes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rita Mendes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rita Mendes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rita Mendes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rita Mendes. The network helps show where Rita Mendes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rita Mendes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rita Mendes Line = papers co-authored together Rita Mendes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1
Targeting Tumor Microenvironment for Cancer Therapy
Hit paper breakdown →
2019891
2 2017140
3 201775
4 201766
5 201860
6 201839
7 202138
8 202024
9 202019
10 201114
11 201611
12 20108
13 20227
14 20252
15 20232
16 20191

About Rita Mendes

Rita Mendes is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Oncology, Cancer Research and Epidemiology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (3 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (3 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (3 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (2 papers), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (2 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (2 papers), Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (2 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (301 citations), Biomaterials (229 citations), Oncology (415 citations), Immunology (268 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (414 citations). Rita Mendes has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Alexandra R. Fernandes, Pedro V. Baptista, Catarina Roma‐Rodrigues, Pedro Pedrosa, João Carlos Lima, Raquel Vinhas, Erwin R. Boghaert, Catarina Brito, Ana Félix and Rita Cabral. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Cancers, ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering and Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact