Rita de la Feria
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Accounting top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Law top 10%
- Strategy and Management
- Topics
- Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (29 papers)Taxation and Legal Issues (28 papers)Taxation and Compliance Studies (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaJapan
In The Last Decade
Rita de la Feria
35 papers receiving 127 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Economics and Econometrics 142
- Accounting 128
- Political Science and International Relations 25
- Law 16
- Strategy and Management 15
Countries citing papers authored by Rita de la Feria
This map shows the geographic impact of Rita de la Feria's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rita de la Feria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rita de la Feria more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rita de la Feria
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rita de la Feria. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rita de la Feria. The network helps show where Rita de la Feria may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rita de la Feria
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rita de la Feria. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rita de la Feria based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rita de la Feria. Rita de la Feria is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Impact of Public Perceptions on General Consumption Taxes | 12 |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | Tax fraud and the rule of law | 2 |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | The Economic Effects of EU Tax Jurisprudence | 1 |
| 10 | Italmoda: The Birth of the Principle of Third-Party Liability for VAT Fraud | 2 |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | Ending VAT Exemptions: Towards a Post-Modern VAT | 10 |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | The Economic Effects of European Tax Jurisprudence | 1 |
| 16 | Thin Capitalization Rules in the Conext of the CCCTB | 9 |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | The Court of Justice solution to aggressive VAT planning - Further towards legal uncertainty? | 2 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Rita de la Feria
Rita de la Feria is a scholar working on Accounting, Economics and Econometrics and Law, having authored 44 papers that have together received 186 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (29 papers), Taxation and Legal Issues (28 papers) and Taxation and Compliance Studies (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (128 citations), Economics and Econometrics (142 citations) and Law (16 citations). Rita de la Feria has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Ben Lockwood, Richard Krever, Giorgia Maffini, Clemens Fuest and Michael Devereux. Their work appears in journals such as Fiscal Studies, Journal of Law and Society and International and Comparative Law Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.