Rika Okamoto
Impact in
- Immunology top 10%
- Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Reproductive System and Pregnancy
- T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Immune Cell Function and Interaction
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Reproductive System and Pregnancy 4
- Oncology 4
- Chemokine receptors and signaling 3
- Co-authors
- Takashi Nagasawa (2 shared papers)Hidetaka Okada (4 shared papers)Katsuhiko Yasuda (4 shared papers)Hideharu Kanzaki (4 shared papers)Takeshi Egawa (1 shared paper)Pandelakis A. Koni (1 shared paper)Toshiaki Ara (1 shared paper)Hiroshi Kawamoto (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Fertility and Sterility (3 papers)Blood (2 papers)Immunity (1 paper)BMJ Open Gastroenterology (1 paper)Safety Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Rika Okamoto
14 papers receiving 460 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Immunology 229
- Reproductive Medicine 66
- Oncology 170
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 48
- Hematology 65
Countries citing papers authored by Rika Okamoto
This map shows the geographic impact of Rika Okamoto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rika Okamoto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rika Okamoto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rika Okamoto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rika Okamoto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rika Okamoto. The network helps show where Rika Okamoto may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rika Okamoto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 164 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 88 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 60 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 34 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 1 |
About Rika Okamoto
Rika Okamoto is a scholar working on Immunology, Oncology, Genetics, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 469 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive System and Pregnancy (4 papers), Chemokine receptors and signaling (3 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (2 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (2 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (2 papers) and Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology (229 citations), Reproductive Medicine (66 citations), Oncology (170 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (48 citations) and Hematology (65 citations). Rika Okamoto has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Takashi Nagasawa, Hidetaka Okada, Katsuhiko Yasuda, Hideharu Kanzaki, Takeshi Egawa, Pandelakis A. Koni, Toshiaki Ara, Hiroshi Kawamoto, Kenji Kawabata and Yoshimoto Katsura. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Blood, Immunity, BMJ Open Gastroenterology and Safety Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.