Richard W. Schwester
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Administration top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Communication
- Co-authors
- Marc HolzerTony CarrizalesDouglas CoateMaria J. D’AgostinoJames MelitskiBrad R. HumphreysMichael Mondello
- Topics
- Crime Patterns and Interventions (4 papers)Social Media and Politics (3 papers)E-Government and Public Services (3 papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Public AdministrationPublic Performance & Management ReviewJournal of Public Affairs Education
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Richard W. Schwester
14 papers receiving 174 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Political Science and International Relations 90
- Sociology and Political Science 81
- Public Administration 42
- Economics and Econometrics 35
- Communication 21
Countries citing papers authored by Richard W. Schwester
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard W. Schwester's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard W. Schwester with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard W. Schwester more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard W. Schwester
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard W. Schwester. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard W. Schwester. The network helps show where Richard W. Schwester may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard W. Schwester
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard W. Schwester. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard W. Schwester based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard W. Schwester. Richard W. Schwester is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 45 | |
| 3 | A STUDY OF E-GOVERNMENT AND E-GOVERNANCE: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF MUNICIPAL WEBSITES | 27 |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | Public Administration: An Introduction | 22 |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | ENHANCING THE PROSPECT FOR DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY: THE AMERICASPEAKS MODEL | 7 |
About Richard W. Schwester
Richard W. Schwester is a scholar working on Public Administration, Communication and Strategy and Management, having authored 16 papers that have together received 198 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers) and E-Government and Public Services (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (42 citations), Political Science and International Relations (90 citations) and Communication (21 citations). Richard W. Schwester has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Marc Holzer, Tony Carrizales, Douglas Coate, Maria J. D’Agostino, James Melitski, Brad R. Humphreys and Michael Mondello. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Public Administration, Public Performance & Management Review and Journal of Public Affairs Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.