Richard Van Balen
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Media Technology
- Co-authors
- R. van den BoomgaardGermain LietaerLeslie S. GreenbergA.W.M. SmeuldersFrans C. A. GroenD.C. KoelmaHarm P. SlijperRuud W. Selles
- Topics
- Digital Image Processing Techniques (2 papers)Child Therapy and Development (2 papers)Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (2 papers)
- Journals
- Muscle & NervePattern Recognition LettersUvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsCanada
In The Last Decade
Richard Van Balen
7 papers receiving 375 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Clinical Psychology 161
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 108
- Social Psychology 62
- Biomedical Engineering 30
- Media Technology 24
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Van Balen
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Van Balen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Van Balen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Van Balen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Van Balen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Van Balen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Van Balen. The network helps show where Richard Van Balen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Van Balen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Van Balen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Van Balen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Van Balen. Richard Van Balen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | The theory of experience-centered therapies. | 26 |
| 4 | An application framework for image processing | 1 |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 195 | |
| 7 | 32 | |
| 8 | Client-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapy in the Nineties | 168 |
About Richard Van Balen
Richard Van Balen is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Human-Computer Interaction and Hardware and Architecture, having authored 8 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Image Processing Techniques (2 papers), Child Therapy and Development (2 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (13 citations), Clinical Psychology (161 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (108 citations). Richard Van Balen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include R. van den Boomgaard, Germain Lietaer, Leslie S. Greenberg, A.W.M. Smeulders, Frans C. A. Groen, D.C. Koelma, Harm P. Slijper, Ruud W. Selles, Henk J. Stam and Steven E.R. Hovius. Their work appears in journals such as Muscle & Nerve, Pattern Recognition Letters and UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.